Bug 1324137 - [RFE] Implement v2v support in REST API
Summary: [RFE] Implement v2v support in REST API
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 134687
Alias: None
Product: ovirt-engine
Classification: oVirt
Component: RFEs
Version: 3.6.3.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Michal Skrivanek
QA Contact: Shira Maximov
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: V2V_REST_API
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-04-05 15:27 UTC by Shira Maximov
Modified: 2017-11-16 13:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-11-16 13:59:06 UTC
oVirt Team: Virt
Embargoed:
michal.skrivanek: ovirt-future?
mshira: planning_ack?
mshira: devel_ack?
mshira: testing_ack?

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Shira Maximov 2016-04-05 15:27:08 UTC 
Description of problem:
Please implement v2v support in REST API.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Michal Skrivanek 2016-04-06 06:03:20 UTC 
I understand the need for QA automation, but I'm not sure about practical usefulness. it's a very long running operation, rarely used. And it is just supposed to wrap virt-v2v invocation. It would be easier to call tools directly instead of proxying through ovirt.
Comment 2 Michal Skrivanek 2016-04-15 08:19:59 UTC 
setting this to low then
Comment 3 Michal Skrivanek 2016-04-15 08:22:59 UTC 
damn you, bot
Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2016-07-06 13:06:26 UTC 
We need to have probably two APIs:
1. When there is a VMware external provider in RHEV configured, to v2v the VMs.
2. Via CloudForms, be able to perform a V2V without specifying (creating) a VMware external provider in RHEV.
Comment 5 Michal Skrivanek 2016-07-25 06:51:28 UTC 
basic REST support is covered by bug 1346847, this one is for providers, perhaps even remote listing of VMs (item 1 from comment #4)
Comment 6 Yaniv Kaul 2017-11-16 13:56:10 UTC 
I thought this is all implemented?
Comment 7 Michal Skrivanek 2017-11-16 13:59:06 UTC 
I do not quite recall, but I think this one asked for more (like listing) than the "basic" support in bug 134687
I do not really see the need so let's close it

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 134687 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.