Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1332165 - Hypervisor summary shows incorrect total storage (Ceph)
Hypervisor summary shows incorrect total storage (Ceph)
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-nova (Show other bugs)
8.0 (Liberty)
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: Upstream M2
: 12.0 (Pike)
Assigned To: Eoghan Glynn
Prasanth Anbalagan
Don Domingo
: FutureFeature, Reopened, Triaged
Depends On: 1236473
Blocks: 1336237 1339033 1368279 1430245
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-05-02 07:49 EDT by GE Scott Knauss
Modified: 2017-03-09 11:38 EST (History)
25 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1236473
: 1336237 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-09 11:38:29 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Launchpad 1387812 None None None 2016-05-02 07:49 EDT

  None (edit)
Comment 1 Don Domingo 2016-05-02 18:24:40 EDT
We just recently added a warning about this in the OSP6 docs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311508

Just to verify, did this problem persist in OSP7-8? If so, we will add the same warning to those two releases.
Comment 2 Stephen Gordon 2016-05-02 22:17:55 EDT
(In reply to Don Domingo from comment #1)
> We just recently added a warning about this in the OSP6 docs:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1311508
> 
> Just to verify, did this problem persist in OSP7-8? If so, we will add the
> same warning to those two releases.

Per Eoghan's last comment on the original bug (which appears in the description here), yes. Unfortunately it may also persist in 9 (need to double check).
Comment 3 Matthew Booth 2016-07-08 10:21:58 EDT
This bug is well known, and is in progress upstream under the Resource Pools banner. I would say at this point this will not land for Newton (OSP10). Ocata remains a possibility.
Comment 5 Matthew Booth 2016-09-29 11:58:59 EDT
Closing this here, as it can't be fixed in RHOS 6. This is a highly visible, priority upstream feature, though. It will be resolved, and there's no great benefit to tracking it separately in BZ.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.