Bug 133303 - Old openldap package in the WS channel
Old openldap package in the WS channel
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RHN/Channels (Show other bugs)
RHN Stable
All Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Dennis Gregorovic
Red Hat Satellite QA List
: IT_54239 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-09-22 20:39 EDT by Martin C. Messer
Modified: 2007-04-18 13:12 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2004-12-22 10:24:15 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Martin C. Messer 2004-09-22 20:39:20 EDT
Description of problem:

RHEL 3 WS channels still carry the openldap-servers-2.0.27-15 instead of 
2.0.27-17. -15 causes serious issues with existing openldap installations.


Clicking on New Versions shows the problem clearly.
Comment 1 Chris MacLeod 2004-09-23 09:50:35 EDT
For whatever reason -17 is not in the WS channel though it is in the
AS and ES channels.

Possible that it was missed when an errata was released?

(assigning to timp b/c he's probably the best to answer that question
or will know where to find the answer if it's errata based)
Comment 2 Dennis Gregorovic 2004-10-15 11:09:35 EDT
Looking at the RHEL 3 releases, openldap-servers was never in RHEL 3 WS.  So,
the underlying bug here is that openldap-servers is in the WS channel at all.  

Anyway, however it happened, the package *is* in the WS channel, and there are
machines subbed to it, so let's add 2.0.27-17.  Chris, can you do this?

By the way, the errata is RHBA-2004:224-27, which was part of U3.
Comment 4 Dennis Gregorovic 2004-12-15 14:08:33 EST
openldap-servers packages have been removed from RHEL 3 WS and Desktop
Comment 5 Dennis Gregorovic 2004-12-15 14:09:33 EST
*** Bug 142955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.