Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/sagitter/Ipopt-EPEL/pioneer.git/plain/pioneer.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Ipopt-EPEL/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00316238-pioneer/pioneer-20160512-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Pioneer is a space adventure game set in the Milky Way galaxy at the turn of the 31st century. The game is open-ended, and you are free to explore the millions of star systems in the game. You can land on planets, slingshot past gas giants, and burn yourself to a crisp flying between binary star systems. You can try your hand at piracy, make your fortune trading between systems, or do missions for the various factions fighting for power, freedom or self-determination. Fedora Account System Username: sagitter This package is for Fedora only.
As I said on 1332434, I'm happy to review this. I'll post a full review over the next few days, but for now, some comments (along with rpmlint output): pioneer.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Pioneer pioneer.x86_64: W: no-documentation pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modelcompiler pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pioneer pioneer.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/pioneer.desktop env Maybe "A game of lonely space adventure" would be a better summary? That seems to be their tagline on github and on http://pioneerspacesim.net/. pioneer.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C Pioneer pioneer.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: %{name}-fix_lua_header.patch This patch not being applied is because, as noted in the spec, the version of Lua in Fedora is too new to work with the bundled one in Pioneer. But, as per the new bundling policy, I think you should publicly contact Pioneer upstream about this? fedora-review does not like that the following directories are unowned: /usr/share/icons/pioneer /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40 /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40/apps At least the former should be owned by this package. It looks like Pioneer provides functionality for building Doxygen and Lua documentation as per https://github.com/pioneerspacesim/pioneer/blob/master/COMPILING.txt? This should probably be built and put in a pioneer-doc subpackage. Everything else looks good to me thus far!
SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/pioneer/pioneer.spec SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/pioneer/pioneer-20160512-2.fc23.src.rpm - Made /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40 owned - Replace Summary - Made a doc sub-package
Hm, there are TTFs in the data/fonts directory [1] :( DejaVuSans.ttf, DejaVuSansMono.ttf, and wqy-microhei.ttc appear to be unmodified, and are provided in Fedora by the wqy-microhei-fonts, dejavu-sans-fonts and dejavu-mono-fonts packages in Fedora. These should be unbundled if possible and the pioneer-data package made to depend on the fonts packages. The other three TTFs appear to be modified versions of other fonts... based on the way, say, freecol is packaged [2] (picking another game that has custom fonts at random) and the font bundling/packaging guidelines which still seem to want fonts to be unbundled [3], I think you should create pioneer-*-fonts subpackages for each forked font and have pioneer-data depend on them. Sorry, I know this is probably annoying to deal with... the package looks good to me otherwise, though. Full review follows (below the links). [1] https://github.com/pioneerspacesim/pioneer/tree/master/data/fonts [2] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/freecol.git/tree/freecol.spec [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* Public domain", "zlib/libpng", "GPL (v2)". 801 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bjr/Programming/fedora/1339158-pioneer/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40(gpodder, VirtualBox), /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40/apps(gpodder, VirtualBox) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in pioneer [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 143360 bytes in 4 files. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [!]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in pioneer- data , pioneer-doc , pioneer-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1218560 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: pioneer-20160512-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm pioneer-data-20160512-2.fc25.noarch.rpm pioneer-doc-20160512-2.fc25.noarch.rpm pioneer-debuginfo-20160512-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm pioneer-20160512-2.fc25.src.rpm pioneer.x86_64: W: no-documentation pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pioneer pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modelcompiler pioneer.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/pioneer.desktop env pioneer-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lua -> Lu, La, Luna pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/javascript/prettify.js pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/javascript/main.js pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/styles/1.css 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: pioneer-debuginfo-20160512-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory pioneer.x86_64: W: no-documentation pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modelcompiler pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pioneer pioneer-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lua -> Lu, La, Luna pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/styles/1.css pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/javascript/main.js pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/javascript/prettify.js 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. Requires -------- pioneer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh graphviz hicolor-icon-theme libGL.so.1()(64bit) libSDL2-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libSDL2_image-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libassimp.so.3()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpng16.so.16()(64bit) libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libvorbisfile.so.3()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) pioneer rtld(GNU_HASH) pioneer-data (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): pioneer-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): pioneer-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- pioneer: appdata() appdata(pioneer.appdata.xml) application() application(pioneer.desktop) pioneer pioneer(x86-64) pioneer-data: pioneer-data pioneer-doc: pioneer-doc pioneer-debuginfo: pioneer-debuginfo pioneer-debuginfo(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/pioneerspacesim/pioneer/archive/20160512.tar.gz#/pioneer-20160512.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4520de344d2dc02301d198c47feaa24d79fa15e835ba4abed357d51adc86beba CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4520de344d2dc02301d198c47feaa24d79fa15e835ba4abed357d51adc86beba Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1339158 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
(Just to clarify, by "unbundle" here, all I mean is the TTFs in the package should be replaced with symlinks to the system copies of the font files. Assuming the font bundling policy on the wiki is still correct, anyway).
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #4) > (Just to clarify, by "unbundle" here, all I mean is the TTFs in the package > should be replaced with symlinks to the system copies of the font files. > Assuming the font bundling policy on the wiki is still correct, anyway). SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/pioneer/pioneer.spec SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/pioneer/pioneer-20160512-3.fc23.src.rpm - Unbundle DejaVuSans.ttf DejaVuSansMono.ttf wqy-microhei.ttc font files - Made Inpionata Orbiteer-Bold PionilliumText22L-Medium fonts sub-packages
Great, looks good to me! This package is approved! Full review follows: Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* Public domain", "zlib/libpng", "GPL (v2)". 801 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bjr/Programming/fedora/1339158-pioneer/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40(gpodder, VirtualBox), /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40/apps(gpodder, VirtualBox) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in pioneer [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 143360 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages. Note: Package contains font files [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in pioneer- data , pioneer-doc , pioneer-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1218560 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: pioneer-20160512-3.fc25.x86_64.rpm pioneer-data-20160512-3.fc25.noarch.rpm pioneer-doc-20160512-3.fc25.noarch.rpm pioneer-debuginfo-20160512-3.fc25.x86_64.rpm pioneer-20160512-3.fc25.src.rpm pioneer.x86_64: W: no-documentation pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pioneer pioneer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary modelcompiler pioneer.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/pioneer.desktop env pioneer-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pioneer/fonts/DejaVuSansMono.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf pioneer-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pioneer/fonts/Orbiteer-Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/pioneer/Orbiteer-Bold.ttf pioneer-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pioneer/fonts/PionilliumText22L-Medium.ttf /usr/share/fonts/pioneer/PionilliumText22L-Medium.ttf pioneer-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pioneer/fonts/Inpionata.ttf /usr/share/fonts/pioneer/Inpionata.ttf pioneer-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pioneer/fonts/wqy-microhei.ttc /usr/share/fonts/wqy-microhei/wqy-microhei.ttc pioneer-data.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/pioneer/fonts/DejaVuSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf pioneer-doc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lua -> Lu, La, Luna pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/javascript/prettify.js pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/styles/1.css pioneer-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pioneer-doc/codedoc/javascript/main.js 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. Requires -------- pioneer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh graphviz hicolor-icon-theme libGL.so.1()(64bit) libSDL2-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libSDL2_image-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libassimp.so.3()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpng16.so.16()(64bit) libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libvorbisfile.so.3()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) pioneer-data rtld(GNU_HASH) pioneer-data (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): dejavu-sans-fonts dejavu-sans-mono-fonts pioneer-inpionata-fonts pioneer-orbiteer-bold-fonts pioneer-pionilliumtext22l-medium-fonts wqy-microhei-fonts pioneer-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): pioneer-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- pioneer: appdata() appdata(pioneer.appdata.xml) application() application(pioneer.desktop) pioneer pioneer(x86-64) pioneer-data: pioneer-data pioneer-doc: pioneer-doc pioneer-debuginfo: pioneer-debuginfo pioneer-debuginfo(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/pioneerspacesim/pioneer/archive/20160512.tar.gz#/pioneer-20160512.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 4520de344d2dc02301d198c47feaa24d79fa15e835ba4abed357d51adc86beba CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4520de344d2dc02301d198c47feaa24d79fa15e835ba4abed357d51adc86beba Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1339158 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 Note: fedora-review did not, for whatever reason, automatically rpmlint the fonts packages or check their provides/requires, so I have done that myself. $ rpmlint ./pioneer-*-fonts* pioneer-inpionata-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation pioneer-orbiteer-bold-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation pioneer-pionilliumtext22l-medium-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpm -qpR ./pioneer-*-fonts* fontpackages-filesystem rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 fontpackages-filesystem rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 fontpackages-filesystem rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Thank you Ben.
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pioneer
pioneer-20160512-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-85301993ca
pioneer-20160512-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-85301993ca
pioneer-20160512-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.