Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1353616

Summary: [RFE] Provide option to automatically update Composite content view when a child content view is incrementally updated
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: sthirugn <sthirugn>
Component: Errata ManagementAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: jcallaha
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2.0CC: bbuckingham, bkearney, egolov, jcallaha, ktordeur, pgervase, sthirugn
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-08 18:46:25 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description sthirugn@redhat.com 2016-07-07 15:08:08 UTC
Description of problem:
Provide option to automatically update Composite content view when a child content view is incrementally updated

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite 6.2 Beta Snap 18.2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a content view, add repos, publish, promote
2. Create a composite content view with content view from step1 and select the latest version, publish, promote
3. Incremental update the content view from Step 1

Actual results:
The composite content view is not automatically updated

Expected results:
The composite content is automatically updated

Additional info:
see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304891#c10
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304891#c12

Comment 2 Evgeni Golov 2017-05-23 14:25:39 UTC
IMHO a dupe of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177766

Comment 3 sthirugn@redhat.com 2017-06-05 21:06:32 UTC
@Evgeni: This bug talks about auto promoting composite CV when a child CV is incrementally updated. The bug that you linked in Comment 2 talk about Content view promotion in general.

Are you sure that this issue is addressed for Incremental update scenario as well?  If so, move this bug to ON_QA.  Let's not close this as a dupe as I like QE to test this specifically for Incremental update scenario.

Comment 4 Evgeni Golov 2017-06-06 06:35:16 UTC
Hi,

yes/no/maybe ;)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177766 is in POST, but it should not be (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177766#c15). The linked upstream redmine (http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/15950) is only about providing a "latest" version for CVs, which we now have. But this still does not trigger automatic publish of the CCV if the underlying CV changed, which you and 1177766 are talking about

So I *think* that it should not matter whether the underlying CV is changed incrementally or not 
* for the "latest" version in the CCV to point to the really latest one
* for the triggering of an automatic publish/promote

We have 1, but we don't have 2.

But you are right and we should keep both RFEs open, just to have both ways to change the CV be part of QE for that feature.

Comment 5 Bryan Kearney 2018-03-08 18:46:25 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1536194 ***