Bug 1358513 - Backport: Bug “Dell SC: HighAvailability cannot be set in Async repl” (1597820)
Summary: Backport: Bug “Dell SC: HighAvailability cannot be set in Async repl” (1597820)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-cinder
Version: 9.0 (Mitaka)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ga
: 9.0 (Mitaka)
Assignee: Eric Harney
QA Contact: lkuchlan
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1358512 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1557826 1996794 2060121 1351271 1351275
Blocks: 1305654 1358520
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-07-20 21:37 UTC by Rajini Karthik
Modified: 2022-03-02 18:50 UTC (History)
27 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-cinder-8.0.0-5.el7ost
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1351275
: 1358520 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-24 12:55:43 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Launchpad 1597820 0 None None None 2016-08-03 14:52:05 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 80601 0 None None None 2016-08-03 14:23:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-7465 0 None None None 2022-03-02 18:50:32 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:1760 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE openstack-cinder bug fix advisory 2016-08-24 16:49:58 UTC

Description Rajini Karthik 2016-07-20 21:37:27 UTC 
Description of problem:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1597820
Backport this bug into stable mitaka ( yet TBD)
And pull this into OSP9
Bug “Dell SC: HighAvailability cannot be set in Async repl” (1597820)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Rajini Karthik 2016-07-21 13:10:45 UTC 
Fix proposed to branch: stable/mitaka
Review: https://review.openstack.org/345077
Comment 2 Eric Harney 2016-08-09 20:34:26 UTC 
*** Bug 1358512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-08-24 12:55:43 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1760.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.