Bug 136776 - update will not install
update will not install
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 136754
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: redhat-artwork (Show other bugs)
2
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Dan Williams
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-10-22 06:37 EDT by Justin Cormack
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:10 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-11-01 14:55:45 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Justin Cormack 2004-10-22 06:37:43 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7)
Gecko/20040629 Firefox/0.9.1


Description of problem:

Update will not install, as it needs i386 libbluecurve.so, from
redhat-artwork-0.96-1.i386.rpm, but this conflicts with x86_64 version
of this package needed for otehr packages.

BTW, openoffice has never worked on x86_64 due to other i386 library
issues that I didnt file bug reports for - was hoping they might be
fixed in this update.

Solution is to split out bluecurve libraries from redhat-artwork
(makes sense anyway) and have i386 and x86_64 versions both installed,
or to build openoffice in 64 bit (no idea if thats feasible - guess
would have been done if was easy).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org-1.1.2-10.fc2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install standard fc2
2. Apply updates with yum



    

Actual Results:  Errors reported doing trial run
file /usr/share/xmms/Skins/Bluecurve-xmms.zip from install of
redhat-artwork-0.96-1 conflicts with file from package
redhat-artwork-0.96-1



Expected Results:  Should update.


Additional info:

the redhat artwork packages are the 64 bit and 32 bit versions.
Comment 1 Dan Williams 2004-10-22 09:42:23 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 136754 ***
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2004-11-01 14:55:45 EST
close as duplicate

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.