RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

This bug is only about these options:

Also, starting in RHEL-7.3 and RHEL-6.9 (not the upcoming RHEL6 release, the one after it), there will be two additional commands

list|show pathgroups format $format
list|show pathgroups raw format $format

To display pathgroup information.

As an update: Those new options did not make 7.3, but it's not clear whether they will make 6.9.

Ben:

I don't think I have a record of whether or not these options for multipathd will make RHEL 6.9:

list|show pathgroups format $format
list|show pathgroups raw format $format

To display pathgroup information.

Is this something I can close out?

Steven

No. These changes never got accepted.

and by "No", I mean "Yes". You can close this out.

Closing this as not a bug as per Comment 5.