Spec URL: https://mrunge.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-mattn-go-isatty/golang-github-mattn-go-isatty.spec SRPM URL: https://mrunge.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-mattn-go-isatty/golang-github-mattn-go-isatty-0-0.1.git56b76bd.fc24.src.rpm Description: isatty for golang Fedora Account System Username: mrunge Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15641289 $ rpmlint golang-github-mattn-go-isatty-0-0.1.git56b76bd.fc24.src.rpm golang-github-mattn-go-isatty-devel-0-0.1.git56b76bd.fc24.noarch.rpm golang-github-mattn-go-isatty.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C isatty for golang golang-github-mattn-go-isatty-devel.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C isatty for golang 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
*** Bug 1410385 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1412344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
at the start: %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} == 6 %global with_devel 1 %global with_bundled 0 %global with_debug 0 %global with_check 1 %global with_unit_test 0 %else %global with_devel 0 %global with_bundled 0 %global with_debug 0 %global with_check 0 %global with_unit_test 0 %endif i think this could be: %if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} == 6 %global with_devel 1 %global with_check 1 %else %global with_devel 0 %global with_check 0 %endif %global with_unit_test 0 %global with_bundled 0 %global with_debug 0 ################################ and the actual version (and git revision) would be: %global commit 30a891c33c7cde7b02a981314b4228ec99380cca Version: 0.0.1 Release: 1.git%{shortcommit}%{?dist} please take the release-number with a grain of salt.
Matthias, can you regenerate the spec with the latest gofed? There are some minor improvements of the spec file.
Jan, sorry to keep you waiting here. This dropped in my prio list, and I couldn't get gofed working (permission issues, my user is in gofed group)
I'm happy to close this here in favor of any other review request.
Closed in favor of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430143
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1430143 ***