Bug 1376749 - Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-compress - Optimized compression packages
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-compress - Optimized compression pack...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1375986
Blocks: 1377262 1561757
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-09-16 09:49 UTC by Matthias Runge
Modified: 2018-04-08 21:01 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-08 21:01:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
zebob.m: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)
alternative spec file (1.16 KB, text/plain)
2018-03-26 12:05 UTC, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1564272 0 medium CLOSED Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-compress - Optimized compression packages 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1564272

Description Matthias Runge 2016-09-16 09:49:16 UTC
Spec URL: https://mrunge.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-klauspost-compress/golang-github-klauspost-compress.spec

SRPM URL: https://mrunge.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-klauspost-compress/golang-github-klauspost-compress-0-0.1.git7b02889.fc24.src.rpm

Description: Optimized compression packages

Fedora Account System Username: mrunge

$ rpmlint golang-github-klauspost-compress-0-0.1.git7b02889.fc24.src.rpm golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel-0-0.1.git7b02889.fc24.noarch.rpm golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel-0-0.1.git7b02889.fc24.x86_64.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-10-01 16:37:16 UTC
 - Please use the latest release https://github.com/klauspost/compress/releases

%global commit          6c8db69c4b49dd4df1fff66996cf556176d0b9bf
%global shortcommit     %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
%global commitdate      20170114

Name:           golang-%{provider}-%{project}-%{repo}
Version:        1.2.1
Release:        1%{?dist}

  And:

* Sun Oct 01 2017 Matthias Runge <mrunge> - 1.2.1-1

 - Please also fix:

W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel/README.md


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 144 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/bob/packaging/review/golang-github-klauspost-compress/review-
     golang-github-klauspost-compress/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
     /usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
     /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/klauspost(golang-github-klauspost-
     cpuid-devel, golang-github-klauspost-crc32-devel, golang-github-
     klauspost-reedsolomon-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in golang-
     github-klauspost-compress-devel , golang-github-klauspost-compress-
     unit-test-devel
[?]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel-1.2.1-1.fc28.noarch.rpm
          golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel-1.2.1-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
          golang-github-klauspost-compress-1.2.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel/README.md
golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel/README.md
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/klauspost/compress <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-klauspost-compress-devel/README.md
golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/klauspost/compress <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/golang-github-klauspost-compress-unit-test-devel/README.md
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

Comment 2 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2018-03-26 12:02:51 UTC
FYI, testsuite will fail if you don't apply https://github.com/klauspost/compress/commit/b88785bfd699aa994985ea91b90ee8a1721c3fe1 . Also, it might be worth it to apply https://github.com/klauspost/compress/commit/e80ca55b53e5e6f53deed5c7842e7b7da95e1dc7 as well, to reduce dependencies, because current Fedora and EPEL ship golang 1.8+.

Comment 3 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2018-03-26 12:05:33 UTC
Created attachment 1413093 [details]
alternative spec file

Attaching my spec made using https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging for reference. Feel free to use it.

Comment 4 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2018-03-28 07:27:31 UTC
Updated my spec with the patches mentioned in comment 2 applied:

Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-klauspost-compress/golang-github-klauspost-compress.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-klauspost-compress/golang-github-klauspost-compress-1.2.1-1.fc27.src.rpm

I'd say it's a very good idea to apply those two, because then you can run the test suite without circular dependencies (i.e. it builds against current rawhide). I can submit a new review request if there's no response from Matthias, but I'm not really fond of maintaining this as it's only a dependency of another package.

Comment 5 Matthias Runge 2018-03-28 16:52:58 UTC
I'm sorry to keep you waiting here. I'm currently on vacation, and will be back after Easter. This is a dependency for a package of mine. 

Dominik, thank you for your suggestions, I'll have a look asap.
Robert-André, thank you for your review, and sorry for not responding sooner. I'll address the issues, once I'm back.

Comment 6 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2018-03-28 20:28:05 UTC
I'd appreciate if you use the new Go packaging as Dominik suggested, your package was the last I reviewed in the old guidelines style. Please read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging and ask any questions that might arise.

Comment 7 Matthias Runge 2018-04-04 08:14:40 UTC
Since my attention completely shifted away, I realized, that I currently don't have the time to continue here.

Upstream added another package as dependency for the most recent version. I'm sorry, I need to drop this. Any of you want to take over?

Comment 8 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2018-04-05 21:18:50 UTC
Sure thing, new review submitted as bug 1564272.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.