JanH, why should we test/support rhn-client-tools for python3 for Satellite 5? What is the use case?
(In reply to Tomas Lestach from comment #1) > JanH, why should we test/support rhn-client-tools for python3 for Satellite > 5? What is the use case? I admit that in the bunch of cloned BZs there are some useless ones. That is why I have includede that foreword that mentions that. In this case though, I would like us to test RHN Tools against Sat 560+570+580 on RHEL 5+6+7 because once we have compose, I assume it will be based on current Spacewalk codebase and there were lots of python3 related changes at lots of places. So, this bug serves as a reminder for us (it is ON_QA) about that.