RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1396403 - Trying to access a non-existent directory using automount results in 4 minute hang as not checking the local mount availability
Summary: Trying to access a non-existent directory using automount results in 4 minute...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: autofs
Version: 6.9
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ian Kent
QA Contact: Yongcheng Yang
Milan Navratil
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1401884 1420574
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2016-11-18 09:17 UTC by Yongcheng Yang
Modified: 2017-03-21 11:47 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: autofs-5.0.5-131.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: A server availability probe is not done for mount requests that autofs thinks are local because a bind mount on the local machine should be able to be used. If the bind mount fails an NFS mount on the local machine then tried. Consequence: But if the NFS server is not running on the local machine the mount attempt can suffer a lengthy time out before failing. Fix: To resolve this an availability probe has been added to the case where a bind mount is first tried but fails and autofs falls back to trying to use an NFS server on the local machine. Result: If a bind mount on the local machine fails the fall back to trying an NFS mount on the local machine fails quickly if the local NFS server is not running.
Clone Of:
: 1420574 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-21 11:47:11 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch - fix inconsistent signed usage for __rpc_ping() (1.15 KB, patch)
2017-01-10 01:57 UTC, Ian Kent 		no flags Details | Diff
Patch - check NFS server availability on local mount fallback (3.12 KB, patch)
2017-01-10 01:58 UTC, Ian Kent 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:0780 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE autofs bug fix update 2017-03-21 12:49:10 UTC

Comment 13 Steve Whitehouse 2017-01-05 15:15:24 UTC 
We need to figure out a solution here fairly soon, since time is limited to make changes in 6.9. Is this really a regression?

Steve D / Ian what is the lowest risk option that is open to us?
Comment 14 Ian Kent 2017-01-06 00:45:05 UTC 
(In reply to Steve Whitehouse from comment #13)
> We need to figure out a solution here fairly soon, since time is limited to
> make changes in 6.9. Is this really a regression?
> 
> Steve D / Ian what is the lowest risk option that is open to us?

I think mount.nfs(8) needs work but I also can't leave autofs
open to this.

I should be able to add RPC ping check for this special case
alone without much effort and since the mount ultimately fails
it shouldn't introduce a regression.

I'll do that.
Comment 15 Ian Kent 2017-01-06 00:46:45 UTC 
Steve hasn't devel_acked this so I guess it will be ok for me to
take this for autofs, we can always change it back if need be.
Comment 24 Ian Kent 2017-01-10 01:57:21 UTC 
Created attachment 1238963 [details]
Patch - fix inconsistent signed usage for __rpc_ping()

Missing autofs-5.0.7 patch for rpc_ping.
Comment 25 Ian Kent 2017-01-10 01:58:41 UTC 
Created attachment 1238964 [details]
Patch - check NFS server availability on local mount fallback
Comment 31 Yongcheng Yang 2017-01-11 02:56:42 UTC 
Moving to VERIFIED according to test logs of Comment #30.
Comment 32 Yongcheng Yang 2017-02-09 03:37:32 UTC 
Updating the bug description according to Comment #12 and Comment #14.

Thanks Ian for the explanation.
Comment 36 errata-xmlrpc 2017-03-21 11:47:11 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0780.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.