Description of problem: The latest upgrade to libldb-1.1.29 does not provide the same versioned functions as previous version Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): libldb-1.1.29-1.fc26 How reproducible: Deterministic Steps to Reproduce: 1. rpm -q --provides libldb-1.1.29-1.fc26.x86_64 Actual results: libldb = 1.1.29-1.fc26 libldb(x86-64) = 1.1.29-1.fc26 libldb.so.1()(64bit) Expected results: bundled(libreplace) libldb = 1.1.28-1.fc26 libldb(x86-64) = 1.1.28-1.fc26 libldb.so.1()(64bit) libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.10)(64bit) libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.12)(64bit) libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.15)(64bit) libldb.so.1(LDB_0.9.16)(64bit) // and many others Additional info: It's not bug in rpmbuild because symbols are missing in library sh# objdump -p /usr/lib64/libldb.so.1 | grep LDB_ sh# echo $? 1
sh# objdump -p /usr/lib64/libtdb.so.1 | grep TDB_ sh# echo $? 1
The library requires versioned symbols from libtdb. But they are not provided by latest version of libtdb => BZ1401175 rpm -q --requires libldb | grep TDB libtdb.so.1(TDB_1.2.1)(64bit)
Actually, it is very likely a bug in toolchain because rebuilding the same srpm for fedora 25 gives correct result. Anyway, this BZ should be considered as tracer for rebuilding libldb after fixing the problem.
There was a change in redhat-rpm-config diff -u -r 59/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros 60/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros --- 59/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros 2016-12-03 19:11:47.961580325 +0100 +++ 60/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros 2016-12-03 19:11:58.676645157 +0100 @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ %__global_compiler_flags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-_hardened_cflags} -%__global_cflags %{optflags} +%__global_cflags %{optflags} -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werro %__global_cxxflags %{optflags} %__global_fflags %{optflags} -I%_fmoddir %__global_fcflags %{optflags} -I%_fmoddir Extra compiler error flags caused that -Wl,--version was not recognized by waf. > Checking uname sysname type : not found > Checking uname machine type : not found > Checking uname release type : not found > Checking uname version type : not found > Checking for rpath library support : not found > Checking for -Wl,--version-script support : not found> Checking for C99 vsnprintf : not found > Checking for HAVE_SHARED_MMAP : not found > Checking for HAVE_MREMAP : not found
Created attachment 1228064 [details] Spec file changes Please consider to fix few spec file related patches. The last one is required to pull correctly renamed pacakges and therefore depends on BZ1401225 BZ1401226 BZ1401175
This causes many openQA tests to fail, due to dependency chains that run through the problematic libldb (e.g. sssd-ipa , samba-client-libs ). It's a clear F26 Alpha automatic blocker, as it prevents the composition of the Server DVD image: "Bugs which entirely prevent the composition of one or more of the release-blocking images required to be built for a currently-pending (pre-)release" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Automatic_blockers
sorry, I cited the wrong reason there. It actually hits "Unresolved dependencies on a release-blocking DVD-style (offline installer) image" - the Server DVD does compose, but contains packages with broken deps.
This is fixed, for now, by reverting the redhat-rpm-config change and rebuilding ldb/tdb. If the change is made again, ldb/tdb will need to be fixed for it.
Patches from BZ1401231 required fro this BZ were pushed to samba master * 59abfcb7945103cd4031abac86d51cd51ce052ca * be12f82cf1ca652b06995e84971c878621315d24 * f4c0a750d4adebcf2342a44e85f04526c34268c8 * b7ae41e6ca133e08f1dc62bd49436f51f490f46b It would be good to backport them even thought -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int were removed from redhat-rpm-config
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 26 development cycle. Changing version to '26'.
libldb-1.1.29-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a1a98e19f0
libldb-1.1.29-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a1a98e19f0
libldb-1.1.29-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.