Spec URL: https://radez.fedorapeople.org/python-tackerclient.spec Description: Tacker is an OpenStack based NFV Orchestrator service with built-in general purpose VNF Manager to deploy and operate Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) on an OpenStack based NFV Platform. It is based on ETSI MANO Architectural Framework and provides full functional stack to orchestrate VNFs end-to-end. This is for the client package RDO Gerrit Username: radez
Initial licensecheck output: $ licensecheck -r . ./tackerclient/version.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/v1_0/client.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_vim_utils.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_cli10_vnffgd.py: *No copyright* Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_cli10_vnffg.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_cli10_vnfd.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_cli10_vnf.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_cli10_vim.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/vm/test_cli10_v10_event.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_validators.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_utils.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_ssl.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_shell.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_http.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_command_meta.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_cli10_extensions.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_cli10.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_casual_args.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tests/unit/test_auth.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/vnfm/vnfd.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/vnfm/vnf.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/nfvo/vnffgd.py: *No copyright* Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/nfvo/vnffg.py: *No copyright* Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/nfvo/vim_utils.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/nfvo/vim.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/extension.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/events/events.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/v1_0/__init__.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/tacker/client.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/shell.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/i18n.py: *No copyright* Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/validators.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/utils.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/serializer.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/extension.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/exceptions.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/constants.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/command.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/clientmanager.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/common/_i18n.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tackerclient/client.py: Apache (v2.0) ./tacker_test.sh: *No copyright* UNKNOWN ./setup.py: Apache (v2.0) GENERATED FILE ./releasenotes/source/conf.py: Apache (v2.0) GENERATED FILE ./doc/source/conf.py: UNKNOWN ./LICENSE: *No copyright* GENERATED FILE The project is licensed using the Apache 2.0 license. The code seems to have started from the python-neutronclient code, judging from the git history, which is ok.
Hi, Note that a package review for tackerclient was already approved for fedora in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224, so i think additional review for RDO is not required. We should re-use spec in http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-tackerclient.git/tree and adjust it as needed so that it'll be easy to re-import in fedora in future. Best regards, Alfredo
(In reply to Alfredo Moralejo from comment #2) > Hi, > > Note that a package review for tackerclient was already approved for fedora > in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224, so i think > additional review for RDO is not required. > > We should re-use spec in > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-tackerclient.git/tree and > adjust it as needed so that it'll be easy to re-import in fedora in future. > > Best regards, > > Alfredo True, I had forgotten about the Fedora review. I would propose we close this bug, and then change the commit message in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/4140/ to reference the Fedora review. Since the package is already approved, we can just import it and fix any DLRN-related issues.
I'll close this duplcate and update the rdoinfo review, thanks! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1353224 ***