Bug 1414100
| Summary: | Wrong NFS version selected by default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | jniederm |
| Component: | BLL.Storage | Assignee: | Tal Nisan <tnisan> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Avihai <aefrat> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | future | CC: | bugs, s.kieske, tnisan |
| Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.1.0-beta | Flags: | rule-engine:
ovirt-4.1+
|
| Target Release: | 4.1.0.2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-02-01 14:53:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
*** Bug 1162635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** verified on : Engine: ovirt-engine-4.1.0.1-0.4.master.20170118134729.gitf34da1f.el7.centos.noarch Vdsm: 4.19.2-1 |
Description of problem: When adding new NFS storage domain, the dialog contains (by default hidden) option "NFS version" that has by default value "v3" which is incompatible with nfs server running on Fedora 24. The error error dialog that pops up (after quite a while) states: "Error while executing action Add Storage Connection: Problem while trying to mount target" I.e. it doesn't mention that the problem might be in wrong NFS version. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.2 master, commit 94e107d How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Storage tab > New Domain 2. Fill in necessary fields to add NFS storage domain, leave default ("v3") in nfs version 3. Click OK and wait Actual results: Error dialog pops up Expected results: "Auto Negotiate" option is selected by default in "NFS Version" field. I allows user to actually don't care much about that field as suggested by the fact that it's hidden by default. Additional info: