+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1412489 +++
Description of problem:
In __upcall_inode_ctx_set() if __inode_ctx_set() fails, we should be freeing the allocated inode_ctx. That's not the case now. Thanks Nithya for the pointer.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-01-12 03:53:34 EST ---
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16381 (Upcall: Fix possible memleak when inode_ctx_set fails) posted (#1) for review on master by soumya k (firstname.lastname@example.org)
--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-01-12 10:47:27 EST ---
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/16381 committed in master by Jeff Darcy (email@example.com)
Author: Soumya Koduri <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Thu Jan 12 14:19:31 2017 +0530
Upcall: Fix possible memleak when inode_ctx_set fails
In __upcall_inode_ctx_set(), if inode_ctx_set fails we should
free allocated memory for ctx. This patch takes care of the same.
Reported-by: Nithya Balachandran <email@example.com>
Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reviewed-by: N Balachandran <email@example.com>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <email@example.com>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <email@example.com>
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/16431 (Upcall: Fix possible memleak when inode_ctx_set fails) posted (#1) for review on release-3.8 by soumya k (firstname.lastname@example.org)
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.8.9, please open a new bug report.
glusterfs-3.8.9 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists , packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist  and the update infrastructure for your distribution.