Bug 1434773 - containers: same volume is shown multiple times
Summary: containers: same volume is shown multiple times
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1431705
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: UI - OPS
Version: 5.8.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.8.0
Assignee: zakiva
QA Contact: Einat Pacifici
URL:
Whiteboard: container
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-22 11:01 UTC by Dafna Ron
Modified: 2017-12-22 14:59 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-23 08:59:16 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: Container Management
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dafna Ron 2017-03-22 11:01:03 UTC
Description of problem:

under container -> volumes 

		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound
		cloudforms	dafna-pods	ReadWriteOnce	Recycle	Bound

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

cfme-5.8.0.7-1.el7cf.x86_64
using podfied cfme 
nfs is installed on a separated vm 

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. deploy cfme pod and add openshift as a provider 
2. navigate to compute -> container -> volumes
3.

Actual results:

we have a repeat of the same volume and some of the volumes are missing 
Expected results:


Additional info:

root@dafna-pods-master ~]# oc get pv --all-namespaces -o yaml
apiVersion: v1
items:
- apiVersion: v1
  kind: PersistentVolume
  metadata:
    annotations:
      pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes"
    creationTimestamp: 2017-03-22T09:16:03Z
    name: cloudforms
    resourceVersion: "53376"
    selfLink: /api/v1/persistentvolumes/cloudforms
    uid: 2c35ba7a-0ee0-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
  spec:
    accessModes:
    - ReadWriteOnce
    capacity:
      storage: 2Gi
    claimRef:
      apiVersion: v1
      kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
      name: postgresql
      namespace: pods
      resourceVersion: "53371"
      uid: 7d2dc132-0ee0-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
    nfs:
      path: /exports/v01
      server: 10.35.69.178
    persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Recycle
  status:
    phase: Bound
- apiVersion: v1
  kind: PersistentVolume
  metadata:
    creationTimestamp: 2017-03-21T13:14:03Z
    name: metrics-volume
    resourceVersion: "849"
    selfLink: /api/v1/persistentvolumes/metrics-volume
    uid: 4110fe8e-0e38-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
  spec:
    accessModes:
    - ReadWriteOnce
    capacity:
      storage: 10Gi
    nfs:
      path: /exports/metrics
      server: dafna-pods-nfs.qa.lab.tlv.redhat.com
    persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain
  status:
    phase: Available
- apiVersion: v1
  kind: PersistentVolume
  metadata:
    annotations:
      pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes"
    creationTimestamp: 2017-03-22T09:16:09Z
    name: nfs-pv01
    resourceVersion: "53390"
    selfLink: /api/v1/persistentvolumes/nfs-pv01
    uid: 2f97ca2d-0ee0-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
  spec:
    accessModes:
    - ReadWriteOnce
    capacity:
      storage: 2Gi
    claimRef:
      apiVersion: v1
      kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
      name: cloudforms
      namespace: pods
      resourceVersion: "53372"
      uid: 7d300476-0ee0-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
    nfs:
      path: /exports/v02
      server: 10.35.69.178
    persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Recycle
  status:
    phase: Bound
- apiVersion: v1
  kind: PersistentVolume
  metadata:
    annotations:
      pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes"
    creationTimestamp: 2017-03-21T13:14:03Z
    name: registry-volume
    resourceVersion: "853"
    selfLink: /api/v1/persistentvolumes/registry-volume
    uid: 411184a1-0e38-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
  spec:
    accessModes:
    - ReadWriteMany
    capacity:
      storage: 5Gi
    claimRef:
      apiVersion: v1
      kind: PersistentVolumeClaim
      name: registry-claim
      namespace: default
      resourceVersion: "851"
      uid: 42041569-0e38-11e7-9080-001a4a1697aa
    nfs:
      path: /exports/registry
      server: dafna-pods-nfs.qa.lab.tlv.redhat.com
    persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Retain
  status:
    phase: Bound
kind: List
metadata: {}
[root@dafna-pods-master ~]# 


root@dafna-pods-master ~]# oc get pv
NAME              CAPACITY   ACCESSMODES   RECLAIMPOLICY   STATUS      CLAIM                    REASON    AGE
cloudforms        2Gi        RWO           Recycle         Bound       pods/postgresql                    1h
metrics-volume    10Gi       RWO           Retain          Available                                      21h
nfs-pv01          2Gi        RWO           Recycle         Bound       pods/cloudforms                    1h
registry-volume   5Gi        RWX           Retain          Bound       default/registry-claim             21h
[root@dafna-pods-master ~]#

Comment 1 Federico Simoncelli 2017-03-22 11:21:58 UTC
Zahi is this a duplicate of bug 1431705?

Comment 2 Chris Kacerguis 2017-03-22 13:10:04 UTC
This appears to be mis-filed, sending to UI - OPS team.

Comment 4 zakiva 2017-03-23 08:59:16 UTC
(In reply to Federico Simoncelli from comment #1)
> Zahi is this a duplicate of bug 1431705?

Yes, I checked with Dafna and it seems like a duplicate, closing.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1431705 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.