RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1435840 - [LLNL 7.5 FEAT] rebase conman to 0.2.8
Summary: [LLNL 7.5 FEAT] rebase conman to 0.2.8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: conman
Version: 7.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 7.5
Assignee: Ondrej Vasik
QA Contact: Jan Houska
Lenka Špačková
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1400611 1461180 1465906 1465925 1522983
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-03-25 00:03 UTC by Ben Woodard
Modified: 2018-04-10 09:55 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: conman-0.2.8-1.el7
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
_conman_ rebased to version 0.2.8 The _conman_ packages have been upgraded to upstream version 0.2.8, which provides a number of bug fixes and enhancements over the previous version. Notable changes include: * Scalability has been improved. * *Coverity Scan* and *Clang* warnings have been fixed to improve stability. * Arbitrary limit on the number of Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) Serial Over LAN (SOL) consoles has been fixed. * The default value of the `loopback` setting has been changed to `ON` in the `conman.conf` file.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 09:55:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0683 0 None None None 2018-04-10 09:55:19 UTC

Description Ben Woodard 2017-03-25 00:03:05 UTC 
Description of problem:
LLNL which is also the upstream requests that we rebase conman to 0.2.8 to pick up some performance improvements and fixes needed for their site.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.2.7
Comment 3 Ben Woodard 2017-03-25 04:56:07 UTC 
From: Chris Dunlap <cdunlap>
Subject: Re: [Bug 1022502] Spec file URLs should point to new home page
Date: March 24, 2017 at 5:36:11 PM PDT
To: Ben Woodard <woodard>

Thanks!

You should be able to drop all 4 patches from conman-0.2.7-15.
In fact, conman-0.2.7-hack-around-overflow-issue.patch is wrong and
should be dropped regardless.  I noted that with the patch's author
last year but didn't realized he added it to Red Hat's rpm until now.
I was finally able to see the Coverity Scan results back in Nov when
I found out their scan results are free for open-source projects.

 https://github.com/dun/conman/pull/24

-Chris
Comment 4 Ondrej Vasik 2017-03-27 07:02:24 UTC 
Is this really request for rebase of conman in RHEL 7? Is there some good reason behind it? Usually we don't rebase components in released major version of RHEL unless there is some good reason for it.

As for Fedora, I see Dan Horak already built 0.2.8 in Rawhide - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=866738 , adding him to CC of this bugzilla. Dan, can you please make sure if Chris's comments are addressed by your rebase in Rawhide? Thanks!
Comment 5 Dan Horák 2017-03-27 08:04:30 UTC 
My initial intention on the Fedora side was cleaning up the spec file (mainly for bug #1244218), but because there was a new release available with a number of fixes mentioned in conman's release notes I've rebased it as well. The Fedora version is now clean upstream version, so except some packaging differences it's what Ben/Chris ask for. Although freeipmi is still 1.5.4 in Fedora while 1.5.5 is available, it might be what Chris means in comment #2.
Comment 7 Ben Woodard 2017-03-27 16:10:59 UTC 
The reasons for the rebase are:
1) one of the patches currently being applied introduces a bug
2) the other patches are part of the the 0.2.8 release. LLNL which is upstream made sure that our fixes were incorporated -- except when they were wrong and introduced additional bugs.
3) There are other performance issues that have shown up in the 0.2.7 release which were addressed in the 0.2.8 release.
Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 09:55:06 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0683
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.