Bug 143701 - Could handle missing splash image better
Summary: Could handle missing splash image better
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 112330
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: grub
Version: 3
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Peter Jones
QA Contact: Mike McLean
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-12-24 13:23 UTC by Nigel Horne
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:10 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-01-05 16:13:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Nigel Horne 2004-12-24 13:23:12 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20041020

Description of problem:
If splashimage points to a missing file, it would be better if
grub defaulted to a text mode, however the screen is blank and
you're left wondering what to do. Not even a warning message
that the splash image can't be found appears.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
grub-0.95-3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Edit /etc/grub.conf so that splash image points to a non existant
hard drive partition, e.g. splashimage=(hd0,9)/grub/splash.xpm.gz
2. reboot
3.
    

Actual Results:  You probably get a blank screen, at best you get a
garbled display

Expected Results:  A text mode default and an error message that
splashimage can't be found.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2004-12-30 18:52:05 UTC
I totally agree with you, it's a worse problem. 

Maybe the bootsplash image should be checked for availability *and* readability,
because with bug #143879 I currently run into the same result.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2005-01-04 19:22:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112330 ***

Comment 3 Peter Jones 2005-01-04 19:52:15 UTC
It's not *really* a dup, just very closely related.  I want to leave
it open for now.

Comment 4 Peter Jones 2005-01-05 16:13:32 UTC
Nevermind, it is a dup, I was looking at the wrong bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 112330 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.