Bug 1440638 - [RFE]: Testing effort tracker for new EC variants 8+2 and 16+4
Summary: [RFE]: Testing effort tracker for new EC variants 8+2 and 16+4
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: disperse
Version: rhgs-3.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: RHGS 3.3.0
Assignee: Pranith Kumar K
QA Contact: Nag Pavan Chilakam
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1417138
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-04-10 07:33 UTC by Rahul Hinduja
Modified: 2017-09-21 04:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.8.4-21
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-21 04:37:54 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2774 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE glusterfs bug fix and enhancement update 2017-09-21 08:16:29 UTC

Description Rahul Hinduja 2017-04-10 07:33:54 UTC
Description of problem:
=======================

One of the 3.3.0 requirement is to test the new variants of EC (8+2 and 16+4). In total following to be tested:

Enhance supported configurations for EC (4+2, 8+2, 16+4, 8+4)

Raising this bug to track the testing effort for 3.3.0. Also to have a doc bug corresponding to this engineering bug.

Comment 4 Nag Pavan Chilakam 2017-04-25 12:00:36 UTC
QA_validation:
Able to create a 8+2 and 16+4 volume successfully and ec properties propograte well with issues. File distribution also works well.
As sanity is working well ,hence moving to verified
Note:that further testing will be still carried forward and will raise any bugs seperately

test version:3.8.4-23

Comment 5 Nag Pavan Chilakam 2017-04-25 12:08:50 UTC
Further Testing activites:
1) we will run basic ec validation including heals on the 2 new varients
2) the majority of testing will still be carried on 4+2 due to limited resources

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2017-09-21 04:37:54 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2774


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.