Bug 1440926 - [RFE] Configure object store with external RADOS gateway
Summary: [RFE] Configure object store with external RADOS gateway
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates
Version: 10.0 (Newton)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: beta
: 16.1 (Train on RHEL 8.2)
Assignee: Giulio Fidente
QA Contact: Yogev Rabl
URL:
Whiteboard: docs-accepted
: 1677489 1687344 1838042 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1765045 1793673
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-04-10 18:46 UTC by Chris Fields
Modified: 2023-10-06 17:36 UTC (History)
21 users (show)

Fixed In Version: openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-11.3.2-0.20200530033438.0dfce4e.el8ost
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
With this enhancement, you can configure Red Hat OpenStack Platform (RHOSP) to use an external, pre-existing Ceph RadosGW cluster. You can manage this cluster externally as an object-store for RHOSP guests.
Clone Of:
: 1760771 1793673 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-29 07:49:26 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 456864 0 None MERGED Support for external swift proxy 2021-01-22 09:56:15 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 456871 0 None MERGED Support for external swift proxy 2021-01-22 09:56:15 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 708044 0 None MERGED [train-squash] Backport "all Keystone resources with Ansible" 2021-01-22 09:56:16 UTC
OpenStack gerrit 720230 0 None MERGED swift-external: deprecate External*Url 2021-01-22 09:56:16 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-10401 0 None None None 2022-08-08 12:26:03 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:3148 0 None None None 2020-07-29 07:50:42 UTC

Description Chris Fields 2017-04-10 18:46:31 UTC
Description of problem:

Have a customers with an existing Ceph deployment that includes RADOS gateway.  Customers wants to configure object store, through OSP Director, to use the existing RADOS gateway and disable irrelevant swift services. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
OSP 10

How reproducible:
100%

Actual results:
No existing pattern or instructions for connecting to an existing external RADOS gateway.  

Expected results:
OSP Director integration described above.

Comment 18 Giulio Fidente 2019-02-28 18:06:24 UTC
*** Bug 1677489 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 21 Yogev Rabl 2019-03-13 13:16:42 UTC
*** Bug 1687344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 24 Gregory Charot 2019-11-08 10:41:31 UTC
Setting target to 16.0.1 as per the new triaging policy.

Comment 30 Lon Hohberger 2020-02-13 11:40:25 UTC
According to our records, this should be resolved by openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-11.3.2-0.20200131125640.cc909b6.el8ost.  This build is available now.

Comment 33 Giulio Fidente 2020-04-15 16:48:09 UTC
Moved to 16.1 because some param name changes were firstly introduced post-train [1] but later backported in train too [2]; we'll test the functionality using the new parameter names directly

1. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698107/
2. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708044

Comment 44 Giulio Fidente 2020-06-04 09:58:51 UTC
*** Bug 1838042 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 46 Alex McLeod 2020-06-16 12:31:01 UTC
If this bug requires doc text for errata release, please set the 'Doc Type' and provide draft text according to the template in the 'Doc Text' field. The documentation team will review, edit, and approve the text.

If this bug does not require doc text, please set the 'requires_doc_text' flag to '-'.

Comment 51 Yogev Rabl 2020-06-17 13:32:06 UTC
verified

Comment 52 Yogev Rabl 2020-06-17 13:32:47 UTC
verified

Comment 54 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-29 07:49:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3148


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.