Spec URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/python-fpylll.spec SRPM URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/python-fpylll-0.2.3dev-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: A Python wrapper for fplll. Fedora Account System Username: pcpa
Spec URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/python-fpylll.spec SRPM URL: https://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/python-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc27.src.rpm Update to a very higher quality initial package (based on python-cysignals review), and to match dependencies in the current state of the python-cysignals review.
Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448997 ? It's a dependency for building neovim in EPEL7. Thanks!
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #2) > Swap with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448997 ? It's a > dependency for building neovim in EPEL7. Thanks! I was already going to swap this one for my #1447741, but I'll take #1448997 instead and you can take this one. Thanks.
Sorry for the delay! Having problems testing this on mock-rawhide (it can't install the generated RPMs), will try doing this on F26 by rebuilding the dependency.
Package looks good. Might want to upstream the test patch and link to the bug report / mailing list discussion, or if the patch comes from a newer version of the software, link to where it comes from -- but this is not a blocker. APPROVED Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 59 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/michel/1445412-python-fpylll/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-fpylll , python3-fpylll , python-fpylll-debuginfo [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. packager cites compatibility reason for this [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. license file backported from next version [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. might want to upstream this patch (or note if it comes from a newer version) [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: python2-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc27.x86_64.rpm python3-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc27.x86_64.rpm python-fpylll-debuginfo-0.2.3dev-2.fc27.x86_64.rpm python-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc27.src.rpm python2-fpylll.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python2-fpylll.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python3-fpylll.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python3-fpylll.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.build-id python-fpylll.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fplll -> fillip python-fpylll.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fplll -> fillip 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Requires -------- python2-fpylll (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libfplll.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libmpfr.so.4()(64bit) libpari-gmp.so.5()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit) libqd.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) python3-fpylll (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libfplll.so.2()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libmpfr.so.4()(64bit) libpari-gmp.so.5()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpython3.6m.so.1.0()(64bit) libqd.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) python-fpylll-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- python2-fpylll: python-fpylll python-fpylll(x86-64) python2-fpylll python2-fpylll(x86-64) python2.7dist(fpylll) python2dist(fpylll) python3-fpylll: python3-fpylll python3-fpylll(x86-64) python3.6dist(fpylll) python3dist(fpylll) python-fpylll-debuginfo: python-fpylll-debuginfo python-fpylll-debuginfo(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/config.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/bkz.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/bkz_param.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/enumeration.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/gso.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/integer_matrix.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/lll.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/pruner.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/svpcvp.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/wrapper.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/gmp/pylong.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/io.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/numpy.so python2-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/fpylll/util.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/config.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/bkz.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/bkz_param.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/enumeration.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/gso.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/integer_matrix.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/lll.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/pruner.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/svpcvp.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/fplll/wrapper.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/gmp/pylong.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/io.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/numpy.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so python3-fpylll: /usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/fpylll/util.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/fplll/fpylll/releases/download/0.2.3dev/fpylll-0.2.3dev.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : f5652639ba87c90ca449277bf2d55e8adda06fe0ecd8e319ec9d2d88cf8f6340 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f5652639ba87c90ca449277bf2d55e8adda06fe0ecd8e319ec9d2d88cf8f6340 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fplll/fpylll/master/LICENSE : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : c03cea027b4b40e4402fabd08557736727ec3d5bc54ad64ab6472de432198cad CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : c03cea027b4b40e4402fabd08557736727ec3d5bc54ad64ab6472de432198cad Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1445412 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -o --no-cleanup-after --no-clean --uniqueext=fpylll Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64-fpylll Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6
Thanks for the review! The test case is completely rewritten in latest versions (master branch or 0.2.4dev) where the patch would not make sense. The package is not the latest version (0.2.3dev), but the one required by sagemath 7.6 (to be updated).
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-fpylll
python-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e21d9975a2
python-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e21d9975a2
python-fpylll-0.2.3dev-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.