Bug 1446360
| Summary: | [3.5] Routes that specify a path ending in a / do not route to subpaths correctly | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jordan Liggitt <jliggitt> | |
| Component: | Networking | Assignee: | Ben Bennett <bbennett> | |
| Networking sub component: | router | QA Contact: | zhaozhanqi <zzhao> | |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | Docs Contact: | ||
| Severity: | unspecified | |||
| Priority: | unspecified | CC: | aos-bugs, bmeng, eparis, jliggitt, zzhao | |
| Version: | 3.5.0 | |||
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | 3.5.z | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1446627 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-05-11 02:32:33 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1446627 | |||
|
Description
Jordan Liggitt
2017-04-27 17:58:25 UTC
Fixed upstream in master in https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/13867 Fixed upstream in 1.5 in https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/13923 Fixed in 3.5 in https://github.com/openshift/ose/pull/726 Testcase: Create three routes using the same host, routing to different pods (so you can identify which route served which request) Route 1: path of / Route 2: path of /subpath Route 3: path of /subpath/ Ensure the following urls are served by the expected routes: route 1: https://<host> https://<host>/ https://<host>/test route 2: https://<host>/subpath route 3: https://<host>/subpath/ https://<host>/subpath/subsubpath What if an user wants to allow to access the http(s)://<host>/ only but none of the subpath? That is not an option today seems this is a duplicate with 1448218 verified using same steps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1448218#c3 agreed. Marking as a dup of 1448218 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1448218 *** *** Bug 1464318 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |