REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#3) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#1) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#2) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#4) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#3) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#5) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#4) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#6) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#5) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#7) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#6) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#8) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17200 (mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly) posted (#7) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#9) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17200 committed in master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) ------ commit e71119e942eb016ba5a11c3f986715f16da10b82 Author: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Date: Thu Nov 10 10:56:26 2016 +0530 mount/fuse: Handle racing notify on more than one graph properly Make sure that we always use latest graph as a candidate for active-subvol. Change-Id: Ie37c818366f28ba6b1570d65a9eb17697d38a6c5 BUG: 1448364 Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17200 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jeff.us> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/15036 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#10) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17234 (tests/lock_revocation: mark as bad) posted (#1) for review on master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17234 committed in master by Jeff Darcy (jeff.us) ------ commit d5865881de5653a0e810093a9867ab3962d00f67 Author: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Date: Wed May 10 15:44:33 2017 +0530 tests/lock_revocation: mark as bad The test is failing in master. see gluster-devel for more details. Change-Id: I7a589ad2c54bd55d62f4e66fdf8037c19fc123ea BUG: 1448364 Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17234 NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jeff.us>
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/15036 committed in master by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) ------ commit cea8b702506ff914deadd056f4b7dd20a3ca7670 Author: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Date: Fri May 5 15:21:30 2017 +0530 event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire Currently socket is added back for future events after higher layers (rpc, xlators etc) have processed the message. If message processing involves signficant delay (as in writev replies processed by Erasure Coding), performance takes hit. Hence this patch modifies transport/socket to add back the socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message, but before notification to higher layers. credits: Thanks to "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat> for assitance in fixing a regression in bitrot caused by this patch. Change-Id: I04b6b9d0b51a1cfb86ecac3c3d87a5f388cf5800 BUG: 1448364 Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/15036 CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts>
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17391 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#2) for review on release-3.11 by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17391 (event/epoll: Add back socket for polling of events immediately after reading the entire rpc message from the wire) posted (#3) for review on release-3.11 by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp)
https://review.gluster.org/17391 has been merged
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.12.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.12.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-September/000082.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/