Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 14489

Summary: RFE:/tmp/upgrade.log refinement: packages available but not upgraded
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Pekka Savola <pekkas>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Matt Wilson <msw>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 7.1Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-02-08 21:27:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 13101    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Pekka Savola 2000-07-23 18:52:38 UTC 
This is a refinement suggestion about #13101.  Since it was a separate
thing, I wanted to file another report on it.

As of beta4, there is a list of RPMs in distribution that weren't upgraded
(The following packages were available on the CD but NOT upgraded: [...])

If easily possible, the list should be expanded to two more categories:

1) RPMs that weren't upgraded because there were no such packages, or they
weren't Obsoleted. Ie. packages like AfterStep which aren't in main
distribution anymore.

2) RPMs that weren't upgraded because newer version didn't exist but the
package itself did.  This can happen between minor releases; e.g.
'rootfiles' in RH60 and RH62 were the same.

3) RPMs that are totally new.
Comment 1 Michael Fulbright 2000-07-25 14:21:51 UTC 
Request for feature change noted.
Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2000-09-26 16:11:06 UTC 
Moving to RESOVLED - DEFERRED from CLOSED - DEFERRED
Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2000-09-26 16:56:47 UTC 
Moving to RESOVLED - DEFERRED from CLOSED - DEFERRED
Comment 4 Michael Fulbright 2000-09-26 19:48:01 UTC 
Related to bug 13100 and bug 13521.
Comment 5 Michael Fulbright 2001-02-08 21:27:41 UTC 
This is done right?
Comment 6 Matt Wilson 2001-02-08 21:29:34 UTC 
this really can't be done.