Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1451349 - [ceph-container]: osd process group should be "ceph" inside container and /etc/ceph owner should be ceph:ceph
[ceph-container]: osd process group should be "ceph" inside container and /et...
Status: POST
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Container (Show other bugs)
2.3
Unspecified Unspecified
low Severity low
: rc
: 2.*
Assigned To: leseb
shylesh
Erin Donnelly
:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1437916
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2017-05-16 09:09 EDT by shylesh
Modified: 2017-12-15 14:17 EST (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
.The container image has incorrect owner and group IDs In the Red Hat Ceph Storage container image, the owner and group IDs for some processes are incorrect. The group ID of the `ceph-osd` process is `disk` when it is supposed to be `ceph`. The owner and group IDs for the files `/etc/ceph/` `root:root` when they it is supposed to be `ceph:ceph`.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Comment 2 seb 2017-05-16 09:14:38 EDT
Upstream PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-docker/pull/643
Comment 4 Federico Lucifredi 2017-06-02 16:18:07 EDT
+1 to Seb's suggestion to move to 2.4
Comment 12 seb 2017-06-15 09:42:15 EDT
LGTM :)
Comment 13 seb 2017-06-30 10:11:33 EDT
Discussed that with Sage and 'disk' seems to be fine, so I'm putting this on the side for now.
Comment 14 Gregory Meno 2017-12-12 09:17:56 EST
Seb,

Looks like this issue is in POST due to https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/pull/616
would you please confirm ?
Comment 15 leseb 2017-12-15 14:17:21 EST
According to my Comment 13rd, I think we should close this as I checked with Sage and current permissions are fine. So this won't be implemented.
Thanks.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.