Bug 1459593 - rgw: heavy memory leak when multisite sync fail
Summary: rgw: heavy memory leak when multisite sync fail
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 2.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 2.3
Assignee: Casey Bodley
QA Contact: shilpa
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1448214 1456981 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-06-07 14:25 UTC by Orit Wasserman
Modified: 2022-02-21 18:03 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-10.2.7-27.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.7-29redhat1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-19 13:34:07 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 19446 0 None None None 2017-06-07 14:25:06 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 3080861 0 None None None 2017-06-14 20:20:47 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:1497 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Red Hat Ceph Storage 2.3 bug fix and enhancement update 2017-06-19 17:24:11 UTC

Description Orit Wasserman 2017-06-07 14:25:06 UTC 
Description of problem:

heavy memory leak was found when the site sync failed in an active-active multisite clusters (2 sites).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
upstream 10.2.6

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 2 Orit Wasserman 2017-06-07 14:27:50 UTC 
upstream fix: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/14714
Comment 12 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2017-06-09 14:10:12 UTC 
*** Bug 1456981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 13 shilpa 2017-06-12 06:08:15 UTC 
Based on c#11, moving the BZ to verified.
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2017-06-19 13:34:07 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1497
Comment 16 Casey Bodley 2017-07-10 14:27:42 UTC 
*** Bug 1448214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.