Bug 1469872 - [Docs][RFE][Director][UI] Auto-discovery/Introspection data in UI
Summary: [Docs][RFE][Director][UI] Auto-discovery/Introspection data in UI
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 12.0 (Pike)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ga
: ---
Assignee: Dan Macpherson
QA Contact: Charelle Collett
URL:
Whiteboard: docs-accepted
Depends On: 1422642
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-07-12 03:18 UTC by Dan Macpherson
Modified: 2017-12-19 04:20 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-19 04:20:40 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Macpherson 2017-07-12 03:18:55 UTC 
== DECRIPTION ==
As a deployer, I want the application to auto-discover locally attached storage details. Disks, Type, Controller, Size, Device Name, Topology, RAID, Vendor, Firmware rev

== DOCS IMPACT ==
Integrating introspection data into the UI
Comment 1 Lucy Bopf 2017-08-08 03:36:20 UTC 
Assigning to Dan for review.
Comment 4 Dan Macpherson 2017-11-23 05:39:45 UTC 
I've update the content on the node information screen, which has been released as part of beta:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/12-beta/html/director_installation_and_usage/chap-configuring_basic_overcloud_requirements_with_the_ui_tools#sect-Accessing_for_the_Web_UI

Ola, can you have a look and let me know if this covers the feature?
Comment 5 Dan Macpherson 2017-12-11 02:55:21 UTC 
No response in several weeks. Switching to peer review. Link to content here:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/12/html/director_installation_and_usage/chap-configuring_basic_overcloud_requirements_with_the_ui_tools#sect-Accessing_for_the_Web_UI
Comment 6 Charelle Collett 2017-12-11 09:30:02 UTC 
Section 7.2 looks good to me Dan.  Is it just that section that needs to be reviewed?
Comment 7 Dan Macpherson 2017-12-11 13:34:30 UTC 
There are some other sections but I think they're being reviewed in separate BZs.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.