Bug 147093 - [PATCH] Use blue for the "Fedora" text in rc.sysinit
Summary: [PATCH] Use blue for the "Fedora" text in rc.sysinit
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: initscripts   
(Show other bugs)
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bill Nottingham
QA Contact: Brock Organ
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EasyFix, FutureFeature, Patch
: 155547 171033 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 171491 FC5Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-02-04 12:28 UTC by Ville Skyttä
Modified: 2014-03-17 02:52 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 8.26-1
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-07 12:45:58 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Use blue for the "Fedora" text while booting (526 bytes, patch)
2005-02-04 12:28 UTC, Ville Skyttä
no flags Details | Diff

Description Ville Skyttä 2005-02-04 12:28:10 UTC
Fedora's color is more blue than red, perhaps reflect that in rc.sysinit? :)
Patch attached.

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2005-02-04 12:28:10 UTC
Created attachment 110644 [details]
Use blue for the "Fedora" text while booting

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2005-02-04 20:30:29 UTC
Obviously this calls for THEMES!

Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2005-02-04 22:36:54 UTC
Yes!  Knoppix already has a... well, if not a "high color", a "lot color" one
out there waiting to be borrowed.

Comment 4 Need Real Name 2005-03-16 10:13:41 UTC
I think this is release critical.

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2005-04-21 20:25:29 UTC
*** Bug 155547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Need Real Name 2005-04-21 20:28:05 UTC
FC4T2 freeze blocker?

Comment 7 Rahul Sundaram 2005-08-13 23:32:24 UTC
Setting priority high since patch is included

Comment 8 Warren Togami 2005-08-13 23:56:58 UTC
Haven't you noticed that we totally ignore the Priority field?  Please prepend
[PATCH] to bugs with patches provided in order to help make it more obvious.



Comment 9 Rahul Sundaram 2005-08-15 17:55:39 UTC
Warren,

Would maintainers notice that any more than an explicit for that purpose?. It
would be better to have a explicit flag for doing queries rather than a change
in subject. Also is it possible for triaging people to change the subject of the
original report?

Comment 10 Bill Nottingham 2005-10-17 20:12:29 UTC
*** Bug 171033 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 Need Real Name 2006-01-16 12:53:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> FC4T2 freeze blocker?

Also missing from FC5T2.

Comment 12 Miloslav Trmač 2006-02-07 12:45:58 UTC
Applied in initscripts-8.26-1.  Thanks!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.