Description of problem: The current defaults in Satellite 6.2 are very conservative for any practical deployment. We would have to make some of the tunings as mentioned in the Satellite Performance and Scale Brief, default in the upcoming releases for Satellite. Some of the tunings that can be made to go default include: 1). /etc/httpd/conf.d/05-foreman-ssl.d/katello.conf KeepAlive On MaxKeepAliveRequests 0 KeepAliveTimeout 5 2). cat /etc/systemd/system/httpd.service.d/limits.conf LimitNOFILE=640000 3). /etc/systemd/system/qpidd.service.d/limits.conf LimitNOFILE=640000 4). /etc/systemd/system/qdrouterd.service.d/limits.conf LimitNOFILE=640000 5). /var/lib/pgsql/data/postgresql.conf shared_buffers = 256MB work_mem=4MB 6). /etc/systemd/system/smart_proxy_dynflow_core.service.d/limits.conf LimitNOFILE=640000 7) Application level passenger tunings. /etc/httpd/conf.d/05-foreman-ssl.conf PassengerAppRoot /usr/share/foreman PassengerRuby /usr/bin/ruby193-ruby PassengerMinInstances 6 PassengerStartTimeout 500 PassengerMaxPreloaderIdleTime 0 PassengerMaxRequests 10000 PassengerPreStart https://example.com /etc/httpd/conf.d/25-puppet.conf PassengerMinInstances 6 PassengerStartTimeout 500 PassengerMaxPreloaderIdleTime 0 PassengerMaxRequests 10000 PassengerPreStart https://example.com:8140 Note 1: The PassengerMinInstances has the max limit of equivalent to PassengerMaxPoolSize Note 2: We are currently evaluating the performance tunings for Satellite 6.3, but except the passenger tunings mentioned here, all other tunings can be made to go default in 6.3 release also.
Hello Saurabh, Thank you for the bugzilla report. This looks like it may be considered a duplicate of bug 1312098. That bug is tracking the need to improve the default tuning of Satellite 6. Any objections to closing this one so that we can track the issue on a single place?
(In reply to Brad Buckingham from comment #2) > Hello Saurabh, > > Thank you for the bugzilla report. This looks like it may be considered a > duplicate of bug 1312098. That bug is tracking the need to improve the > default tuning of Satellite 6. Any objections to closing this one so that > we can track the issue on a single place? Hey Brad, Just took a look at the BZ you mentioned and I think, we can close this bug with the tunings mentioned in the description of this bug copied over to bug 1312098.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1312098 ***