Bug 152881 - CAN-2004-888,889,1125 xpdf buffer overflows apply to tetex
CAN-2004-888,889,1125 xpdf buffer overflows apply to tetex
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE
Product: Fedora Legacy
Classification: Retired
Component: Package request (Show other bugs)
unspecified
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Fedora Legacy Bugs
LEGACY
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-01-10 10:11 EST by David Lawrence
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:38 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 14:08:18 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description David Lawrence 2005-03-30 18:30:49 EST
according to http://www.mandrakesoft.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2004:166
, tetex also includes the buggy xpdf code vulnerable to CAN-2004-0888,0889,1125.



------- Additional Comments From michal@harddata.com 2005-01-18 14:52:58 ----

Isn't that really a duplicate of bug #2334?



------- Additional Comments From rob.myers@gtri.gatech.edu 2005-01-19 05:42:13 ----

yep its a dupe.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2334 ***



------- Bug moved to this database by dkl@redhat.com 2005-03-30 18:30 -------

This bug previously known as bug 2373 at https://bugzilla.fedora.us/
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2373
Originally filed under the Fedora Legacy product and Package request component.

Unknown priority P2. Setting to default priority "normal".
Unknown platform PC. Setting to default platform "All".
Unknown operating system Windows XP. Setting to default OS "Linux".
The original reporter of this bug does not have
   an account here. Reassigning to the person who moved
   it here, dkl@redhat.com.
   Previous reporter was bugzilla.fedora.us@beej.org.
Setting qa contact to the default for this product.
   This bug either had no qa contact or an invalid one.

Comment 1 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 14:08:18 EST
Changed to 'CLOSED' state since 'RESOLVED' has been deprecated.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.