Created attachment 1375373 [details] Red underline Text is using wrong fonts while Blue is with correct fonts Description of problem: Panjabi/Punjabi translated UI is broken as UI text was display with two different type of fonts and one on them is not properly display text. one font Lohit Punjabi - correct (underlined Blue in attachment) gnu free sans/serif - incorrect (underlined Red in attachemt) Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): anaconda-27.20.4-4.fc27.x86_64.rpm gnu-free-sans-fonts-20120503-15.fc27.noarch gnu-free-serif-fonts-20120503-15.fc27.noarch How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. run liveinstall 2. select Punjabi (ਪੰਜਾਬੀ) language from GUI 3. click Next Actual results: Rendering is not proper and consistent throu UI Expected results: consistent translated GUI Additional info: Some Panjabi Text was with Lohit Punjabi font, while other was using gnu free fonts
Created attachment 1375374 [details] another screenshot
I was using Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-27-1.6.iso and run installer by double click Live install. if run from terminal and set Language variable (with LANG=pa_IN.UTF-8) then interface text is *proper*.
Do you still see this will F28 or F29?
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3) > Do you still see this will F28 or F29? I am sure about problem with F28, but I will test for F29 latest test build and then update again. thanks
Created attachment 1496701 [details] Fedora 29 Screenshot
Created attachment 1496702 [details] Fedora 29 Screenshot
Bug still exist with Fedora 29. Yellow underline.
Actually I am not sure why we install gnu-free-fonts by default still?
Still exist in Fedora 30
Fedora 31 still have same issue Tested with: Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-31-20190902.n.0.iso
The fonts for Live ISO are defined by Fedora kickstart files. Reassigning to spin-kickstarts.
Moving to livecd/kde
Is this a KDE Spin specific issue...? Does the same issue exist on Fedora Workstation? I would suggest moving to fontconfig say for lack of a better component. I think it should either be solved in @fonts or fontconfig fedora .conf priorities.
We have a fontconfig config file per packages. nothing we can do for this in fontconfig. and gnu-free-fonts has lower priority enough (they are assigned to 69) and google-noto-sans-gurmukhi-fonts (new default font for Punjabi, changed in f31. see Bug#1554988) has a higher priority than gnu-free-fonts (they are assigned to 65-0). In fact, on Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-31-20190909.n.0.iso: $ fc-match :lang=pa NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" The font selection itself works as expected. please retest and provide more information.
Created attachment 1629384 [details] Fedora 31 - Oct 25, 2019 - still issue I tested on Fedora 31 Oct 25 build (attaching screenshot) and still have issue
Tested with Gnome Workstation Live ISO Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-31-20191024.n.2.iso
$ locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL= $ fc-match sans-serif:lang=pa NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" $ fc-match serif:lang=pa NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" $ fc-match monospace:lang=pa NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" $ LANG=pa_IN.UTF-8 fc-match sans-serif NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" $ LANG=pa_IN.UTF-8 fc-match serif NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" $ LANG=pa_IN.UTF-8 fc-match monospace NotoSansGurmukhi-Regular.ttf: "Noto Sans Gurmukhi" "Regular" All of queries to fontconfig is expected results. something may need to be changed in anaconda perhaps. reassigning.
Used Fedora 31 HTTP installation (not LIVE ISO), Interface is using normal glyphs without any issue.
Created attachment 1715922 [details] Fedora 33 WS iso installation, fixed issue screenshot I believe this issue does not exist anymore in Fedora 33 now.
Hello A S Alam, can you please tell me confirm if this is fixed as Parage Nemade suggests? (or not fixed?) I will attach screenshots from current f33 live and rawhide boot iso.
Created attachment 1716637 [details] Rawhide and f33 live, maybe fixed
Tested with Fedora 33 Live and Network installation, Correct font selected in both cases. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-20200928.n.0.iso