Bug 1539892 - [starter-ca-central-1] errors during migration of storage on 3.8
Summary: [starter-ca-central-1] errors during migration of storage on 3.8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Master
Version: 3.9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.9.0
Assignee: Mo
QA Contact: ge liu
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1537751
Blocks: 1539889 1539890
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-01-29 19:33 UTC by Mo
Modified: 2018-03-28 14:24 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1537751
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-28 14:23:55 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0489 0 None None None 2018-03-28 14:24:35 UTC

Comment 3 ge liu 2018-02-05 07:52:43 UTC
Verified on ocp env:

# openshift version
openshift v3.9.0-0.36.0
kubernetes v1.9.1+a0ce1bc657
etcd 3.2.8

#  oc adm migrate storage --include='*'  --confirm
summary: total=1489 errors=0 ignored=0 unchanged=1489 migrated=0
# oc adm migrate storage --include=imagestreams,rolebindingrestrictions,rolebindings,secrets --confirm
summary: total=370 errors=0 ignored=0 unchanged=370 migrated=0

But I'm wonder that why there is not migrated object, is there not change about stored version of API objects??

Comment 4 Mo 2018-02-14 02:22:07 UTC
(In reply to ge liu from comment #3)
> Verified on ocp env:
> 
> # openshift version
> openshift v3.9.0-0.36.0
> kubernetes v1.9.1+a0ce1bc657
> etcd 3.2.8
> 
> #  oc adm migrate storage --include='*'  --confirm
> summary: total=1489 errors=0 ignored=0 unchanged=1489 migrated=0
> # oc adm migrate storage
> --include=imagestreams,rolebindingrestrictions,rolebindings,secrets --confirm
> summary: total=370 errors=0 ignored=0 unchanged=370 migrated=0
> 
> But I'm wonder that why there is not migrated object, is there not change
> about stored version of API objects??

Yes, it is possible to have change in all objects, especially when you have a very small number of objects of limited type variety.

Comment 5 Mo 2018-02-14 02:22:54 UTC
Sorry, I meant to say, "have no change in all objects"

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-03-28 14:23:55 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0489


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.