Bug 156068 - win2003 sp1 breaks samba winbind
Summary: win2003 sp1 breaks samba winbind
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 3.0
Hardware: i386 Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jay Fenlason
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 157198 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 156321
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-04-27 10:51 UTC by EE CAP Admin
Modified: 2014-08-31 23:27 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-634
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-28 15:58:58 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2005:634 qe-ready SHIPPED_LIVE samba bug fix update 2005-09-28 04:00:00 UTC

Description EE CAP Admin 2005-04-27 10:51:39 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 Red Hat/1.0.3-1.4.1 Firefox/1.0.3

Description of problem:
an update to win2003 domain controllers to SP1 has broken winbind on EL3 and I gues EL4 too.  (but until you release a version of EL4 with working nfs ACLs I cannot upgrade to that to test)

                 ===============================
                   Release Notes for Samba 3.0.14a
                              Apr 14, 2005
                   ===============================

Common bugs fixed in 3.0.14a include:

  o Compatibility issues between Winbind and Windows 2003 SP1
    domain controllers (*2k3sp1*).
  o MS-DFS errors with Windows XP SP2 clients.
  o High CPU loads caused by infinite loops in the FindNext()
    server code.
  o Invalid SMB_ASSERT() which caused smbd to panic on ACL'd 
    files.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
samba-3.0.9-1.3E.2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. upgrade your ADS server to 2003 sp1
2. ACLs will break on your unix fileserver running EL3
3. 
  

Actual Results:  ACLs no longer appear in the windows security dialogue box... I just get windows SID umbers and I can't remember those off the top of my head.

Expected Results:  I see usernames and not numbers in the windows security dialogue.

Additional info:

The samba team released a patch for this on 14th April.  When do we expect this to be fixed in EL3?  It is stopping many of us from working.

Comment 3 EE CAP Admin 2005-05-05 09:26:15 UTC
Guys - can anyone give me info on when this will be fixed?

I see there has now been some activity but some feedback would be welcome.

Paul

Comment 4 Jay Fenlason 2005-05-05 14:47:34 UTC
For scheduling information like that, you need to talk to your support 
contact.  I only make fixes--I don't control when they get released. . . 

Comment 5 EE CAP Admin 2005-05-07 14:15:48 UTC
Jay - thanks.  I'll follow up on our support contract then.

Paul

Comment 6 Jay Fenlason 2005-05-09 14:48:27 UTC
*** Bug 157198 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Vince Worthington 2005-06-15 19:20:00 UTC
Will build a 3.0.9-1.3E-based Samba RPM for RHEL4 and try this patch out and
report back on how it works.  I have a Windows 2003 server here in my test
environ  so should be able to confirm if it works.  Will post an update here to
advise.

--vince

Comment 9 Vince Worthington 2005-06-15 19:27:04 UTC
sorry, meant 3.0.9-1.3E.3-based RPM for RHEL3...

Comment 16 Jay Fenlason 2005-08-10 19:48:38 UTC
*** Bug 165607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 17 Pasi Sjöholm 2005-08-10 21:16:21 UTC
--cut--
Release Notes for Samba 3.0.20rc1

    * Disable schannel on the LSA and SAMR pipes in winbindd client 
      code to deal with Windows 2003 SP1 and Windows 2000 SP4 SR1.
--cut--


Comment 18 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-09-28 15:58:59 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-634.html



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.