Hide Forgot
In RHV 4.2 we rely on recent changes in QEMU-GA. To properly test and deliver the feature we need some of the features from 2.10. Would one of the following be possible? 1) perform rebase to 2.10 in RHEL 7.5; or 2) backport the necessary patches to 2.8. We need the following patches: 0a3d197a71 2017-04-04 | qga: Add 'guest-get-host-name' command 161a56a906 2017-04-19 | qga: Add 'guest-get-users' command 53c58e64d0 2017-04-19 | qga: Add `guest-get-timezone` command e674605f98 2017-07-17 | qemu-ga: check if utmpx.h is available on the system 9848f79740 2017-07-14 | qemu-ga: add guest-get-osinfo command optionaly also the following patches that fix the test-suite: c28afa76c0 2017-07-14 | test-qga: pass environemnt to qemu-ga 339ca68bef 2017-07-14 | test-qga: add test for guest-get-osinfo
Verified bug with qemu-guest-agent-2.12.0-2.el7.x86_64. 1)Test run: https://polarion.engineering.redhat.com/polarion/#/project/RedHatEnterpriseLinux7/testrun?id=virtqe-qemu-guest-agent-RHEL7-6 no found blocker and regression bug 2) confirmed new agent command as below. {"execute": "guest-get-osinfo"} {"return": {"name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server", "kernel-release": "3.10.0-926.el7.x86_64", "version": "7.6 (Maipo)", "variant": "Server", "pretty-name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7.6 Beta (Maipo)", "version-id": "7.6", "variant-id": "server", "kernel-version": "#1 SMP Thu Jul 19 11:52:14 EDT 2018", "machine": "x86_64", "id": "rhel"}} {"execute": "guest-get-host-name"} {"return": {"host-name": "bootp-73-75-126.lab.eng.pek2.redhat.com"}} {"execute": "guest-get-users"} {"return": [{"login-time": 1532574235.102336, "user": "root"}]} {"execute": "guest-get-timezone"} {"return": {"zone": "CST", "offset": 28800}}
Tomáš, You mentioned "qemu-ga: check if utmpx.h is available on the system" in comment0. Could you tell me how to check if utmpx.h is available on the system? I only find this 2 files on system. And they aren't from qemu-guest-agent package. Thanks. # find / -name utmpx* /usr/include/bits/utmpx.h /usr/include/utmpx.h
Hi, there is not much to verify there. The patch is there to make sure build does not fail. So if you already have an RPM then you can consider it as OK.
I suggest you remove the mention of utmpx.h from the doc_text.
Thanks Tomáš, Base on comment9 and comment11, set this bug as verified.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3072