Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 1585232 - [downstream clone - 4.2.4] ovirt-ansible-manageiq role fails to deploy Cloudforms appliance
[downstream clone - 4.2.4] ovirt-ansible-manageiq role fails to deploy Cloudf...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-ansible-roles (Show other bugs)
4.2.2
Unspecified Unspecified
high Severity high
: ovirt-4.2.4
: 4.2.4
Assigned To: Ondra Machacek
Petr Kubica
https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-ansibl...
: ZStream
Depends On: 1570608
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2018-06-01 11:12 EDT by RHV Bugzilla Automation and Verification Bot
Modified: 2018-06-27 06:02 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: ovirt-ansible-manageiq-1.1.9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1570608
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-06-27 06:02:06 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: Infra
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)


External Trackers
Tracker ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github oVirt/ovirt-ansible-manageiq/pull/37 None None None 2018-06-01 11:13 EDT
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:2069 None None None 2018-06-27 06:02 EDT

  None (edit)
Description RHV Bugzilla Automation and Verification Bot 2018-06-01 11:12:41 EDT
+++ This bug is a downstream clone. The original bug is: +++
+++   bug 1570608 +++
======================================================================

Description of problem:
Due to the difference between upstream and downstream deployment mechanism for Manageiq/Cloudforms which on downstream requires a init command for the appliance, the role fails on bringing CF up and configure RHV as a provider inside.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.use the default playbook in the examples provided in the ovirt ansible roles RPM
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

(Originally by Moran Goldboim)
Comment 1 RHV Bugzilla Automation and Verification Bot 2018-06-01 11:12:46 EDT
Deferring to 4.2.4.
Moran - please attach the requirements docs for the feature (I have not been able to find it).

(Originally by Yaniv Kaul)
Comment 2 RHV Bugzilla Automation and Verification Bot 2018-06-01 11:12:49 EDT
(In reply to Yaniv Kaul from comment #1)
> Deferring to 4.2.4.
> Moran - please attach the requirements docs for the feature (I have not been
> able to find it).

I can't find it as well right now, but this is a supported role from 4.1 release. it's simply doesn't work the same way with CloudForms between upstream and downstream.

a patch (https://github.com/oVirt/ovirt-ansible-manageiq/pull/37) that fixes the problem already there, and validated by me.
QE has approved to consume this change and test it.

not sure why the conditional nack, or pushing it to zstream when we know this function is broken and we have a fix.

(Originally by Moran Goldboim)
Comment 3 RHV Bugzilla Automation and Verification Bot 2018-06-01 11:12:51 EDT
We have a proposed fix upstream, that's all.
Moving to POST.

I think the patch is good and I hope it can make it to GA. If not, since it's clearly not a blocker (I don't see the requirements the support for CFME - I don't recall 4.1 supported it as well, it's not even documented anywhere in our d/s docs), it is now targeted to the 1st z-stream.

(Originally by Yaniv Kaul)
Comment 6 Petr Kubica 2018-06-08 04:39:26 EDT
Verified in ovirt-ansible-manageiq-1.1.10-1.el7ev.noarch
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2018-06-27 06:02:06 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2069

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.