Bug 159178 - 7.1 Packages moved to extras is incomplete
7.1 Packages moved to extras is incomplete
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM
Product: Fedora Documentation
Classification: Fedora
Component: release-notes (Show other bugs)
devel
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Release Notes Tracker
Tammy Fox
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsPro...
:
Depends On:
Blocks: fc-relnotes-traqr
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-05-30 21:29 EDT by Bill Nottingham
Modified: 2014-03-16 22:54 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-09-23 01:56:54 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Bill Nottingham 2005-05-30 21:29:36 EDT
Description of problem, bug, incorrect information, or enhancement request:

Off the top of my head, also:
- Maelstrom
- libtabe
- recode
- SDL_image
- SDL_mixer
- SDL_net
- xboard
- gnuchess
- balsa

A better rundown of this needs done.


Version of release notes this bug refers to:

Fedora Core 4 final release
Comment 1 Karsten Wade 2005-05-31 20:03:47 EDT
Short term I will add these packages to the list.

I was not happy with the lists I did during testing, they were treediffs between
FC3-HEAD and FC4, and were entirely without context.  Rahul asked me to repeat
that for the release, but I don't know if it is useful or harmful to include.  I
 punted by taking the list that Rahul knew.

If it seems worthwhile still, I can include the list of packages that were in
FC3 but are not in FC4.  That doesn't say where they went to, if they got
renamed, etc.  Like I said, of dubious value.

Unfortunately there isn't a good method or process for capturing these changes.

I've had multiple discussions about this recently.  So far, the best option
seems to be something like this:

A. We need to help define what is worth release noting about a package change,
such as a rename, move to Extras, move to Core, etc.

B. When a package is changed:
  1. Developer could put a brief explanation as to what, why, where, etc. plus a
keyword such as RELNOTES in the commit log.
  2. That keyword triggers a message to relnotes@/mailing list/automatic
bugzilla entry (long shot idea).  Something so it doesn't get lost.
  3. Once a release we rally around the RELNOTES captures and make up a list,
then get it vetted during the testing notes.
  4. If a developer has a story to tell that is too long for the commit log, an
email can be sent to relnotes@/mailing list

Right now we just have relnotes@fedoraproject.org, which is the owner of these
bugs.  We -might- want to make that a full mailing list such as
fedora-release-notes-list that can then be a bug owner, receiver of developer
tales, and discussion forum.

Comment 2 Karsten Wade 2006-09-23 01:56:54 EDT
Fixed previously, closing old bug.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.