Description of problem: Problem: In the new eager-lock implementation lk-owner is assigned after the 'local' is added to the eager-lock list, so there exists a possibility of lock being sent even before lk-owner is assigned. Fix: Make sure to assign lk-owner before adding local to eager-lock list Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/20455 (cluster/afr: Make sure lk-owner is assigned at the time of lock) posted (#1) for review on master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri
COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/20455 committed in master by "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu> with a commit message- cluster/afr: Make sure lk-owner is assigned at the time of lock Problem: In the new eager-lock implementation lk-owner is assigned after the 'local' is added to the eager-lock list, so there exists a possibility of lock being sent even before lk-owner is assigned. Fix: Make sure to assign lk-owner before adding local to eager-lock list fixes bz#1597805 Change-Id: I26d1b7bcf3e8b22531f1dc0b952cae2d92889ef2 Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu>
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-5.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-5.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-October/000115.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/