Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:

On the Add Subscriptions page, Subs with unlimited entitlements show as having "Max -1"

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

6.4 snap 10

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Import manifest from account which has Unlimited entitlements upstream
2.  Nav to Add Subscriptions page.
3.  Noting the "Max -1" indicator beneath the field, try entering "0" or "-1".

Actual results:
Failure

Expected results:
You can, of course, add any number of these to your account. So perhaps we should just say "unlimited" here as well, since "-1" is confusing, and doesn't make it clear to users they can actually enter any number.

Additional info:

Potentially resolved with adequate docs

Alternately, maybe just some sort of toggle for these types of subs would be good, to add (unlimited) to the local system, because adding an artibitrary #, like '9999999' just looks funny in the UI.

Created attachment 1457492 [details]
screen snippet

Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/24309 from this bug

This was solved as part of bug #1598909.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1598909 ***