Hide Forgot
Created attachment 1505423 [details] DNF.log containing info from all steps above Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run dnf upgrade --refresh using F28 repos 2. Install new gpg keys for F29 and spacewalk-client nightly repos 3. Change repos in spacewalk to F29 repos ( F29, everything and updates) 4. run dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=29 --allowerasing -y 5. run dnf system reboot Actual results: System reboots, can't contact spacewalk server and exits. Expected results: DNF should install cached packages. Additional info: See attached dnf log
Version release info: 2.7.5 Installed: dnf-0:2.7.5-12.fc28.noarch at Tue 23 Oct 2018 07:22:36 PM GMT Built : Fedora Project at Wed 18 Apr 2018 02:29:51 PM GMT Installed: rpm-0:4.14.2.1-2.fc28.x86_64 at Tue 13 Nov 2018 08:50:38 PM GMT Built : Fedora Project at Mon 29 Oct 2018 01:16:30 PM GMT
Network is not available during system upgrades (all packages are already on disk at that time). Can the spacewalk plugin be modified not to crash on unavailable server?
(In reply to Daniel Mach from comment #2) > Network is not available during system upgrades (all packages are already on > disk at that time). Can the spacewalk plugin be modified not to crash on > unavailable server? It does not. I can't see any crash related to spacewalk plugin in logs. AFAICS: ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 123, in cli_run ret = resolving(cli, base) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 146, in resolving base.resolve(cli.demands.allow_erasing) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 832, in resolve raise exc dnf.exceptions.DepsolveError: Problem 1: problem with installed package sbd-1.2.1-4.fc28.1.x86_64 - package sbd-1.2.1-4.fc28.1.x86_64 requires libcrmcluster.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - sbd-1.2.1-4.fc28.1.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.18-2.fc28.1.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: problem with installed package fence-agents-sbd-4.3.0-1.fc28.x86_64 - package fence-agents-sbd-4.2.1-6.fc29.noarch requires sbd, but none of the providers can be installed - package fence-agents-sbd-4.3.0-1.fc29.noarch requires sbd, but none of the providers can be installed - package sbd-1.2.1-4.fc28.1.x86_64 requires libcib.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - pacemaker-libs-1.1.18-2.fc28.1.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fence-agents-sbd-4.3.0-1.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: problem with installed package fence-agents-all-4.3.0-1.fc28.x86_64 - package fence-agents-all-4.3.0-1.fc29.noarch requires fence-agents-sbd, but none of the providers can be installed - package fence-agents-all-4.2.1-6.fc29.noarch requires fence-agents-sbd, but none of the providers can be installed - package fence-agents-sbd-4.2.1-6.fc29.noarch requires sbd, but none of the providers can be installed - package fence-agents-sbd-4.3.0-1.fc29.noarch requires sbd, but none of the providers can be installed - package sbd-1.2.1-4.fc28.1.x86_64 requires libcrmcluster.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package fence-agents-sbd-4.3.0-1.fc28.x86_64 requires fence-agents-common = 4.3.0-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package pacemaker-cluster-libs-1.1.18-2.fc28.1.x86_64 requires libcfg.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - fence-agents-common-4.3.0-1.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fence-agents-all-4.3.0-1.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - corosynclib-2.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ... This is most likely bug #1650173 (fedora / fence-agents), no spacewalk involved. ... 2018-11-13T21:00:08Z ERROR There was an error communicating with Spacewalk server. Spacewalk based repositories will be disabled. rhn-plugin: Error communicating with server. The message was: Name or service not known ... Spacewalk plugin properly reported networking issue and disabled its repos. ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 64, in main return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 99, in _main return cli_run(cli, base) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 115, in cli_run cli.run() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 1016, in run return self.command.run() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf-plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 321, in run self._call_sub("run") File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf-plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 329, in _call_sub subfunc() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf-plugins/system_upgrade.py", line 493, in run_upgrade raise dnf.exceptions.MarkingError(_("Unable to match some of packages")) dnf.exceptions.MarkingError: Unable to match some of packages 2018-11-13T21:00:12Z CRITICAL Error: Unable to match some of packages There's no mention of spacewalk plugin in this traceback. I guess it's caused by missing packages from first traceback.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 28 is nearing its end of life. On 2019-May-28 Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 28. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '28'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 28 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 28 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-05-28. Fedora 28 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.