Description of problem:
is a generic bugzilla logo, not Red Hat logo as it used to be in previous versions.
That makes it hard to immediatelly see Red Hat bugzilla tabs among numerous tabs opened in browser.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ in browser.
2. Check the tab.
Non-Red Hat logo.
Red Hat logo.
*** Bug 1657648 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1657866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1657876 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Just noticed this too, and I agree it makes it hard to find the Red Hat bugs in my browser tabs. It also looses the marketing aspect we used to have with the custom favicon.
What is this thing? This looks like the default profile picture on some "social" networks. Dislike!
Created attachment 1514381 [details]
Shadowman Icon for Bugzilla
I've modified the name to be more representative of what the file actually is.
(In reply to David Hildenbrand from comment #5)
> What is this thing? This looks like the default profile picture on some
> "social" networks. Dislike!
It is the bugzilla logo : https://www.bugzilla.org/
Some bugzilla instances just leave it as default which if you are visiting one of those bugzillas and have Red Hat bugs open you are going to have a difficult time differentiating between the two. I'm changing the severity and priority to urgent, we really should try to resolve this quickly.
It looks like it could be as simple as replacing one file. The URL to the icon is:
I still have shadowman in my cache, I've uploaded him as an attachment.
*** Bug 1661081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hmm, so this is known for more than a month, but nobody found two minutes of their time to fix it (and to have proper branding, if nothing else)? [I agree with comment #7, even I do not know bugzilla internals; I'm not asking for 100% solution, which won't break the next time bugzilla is updated, but someone should be able to invest his/her two minutes to fix a regression and have proper branding, as it used to be. I thought that RH people are that kind of people...] It's "only" five duplicates here, consider looking for duplicates, even filling them, and compare the time spent on a file replacement... This is an easy fix, no? What is the problem then? Technical, or human-like?
Verified on QA server
*** Bug 1669733 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This change has been deployed to partner Bugzilla  for pre-release testing, if your testing reveals any issues please update this bug.
(In reply to Jeff Fearn from comment #14)
> This change has been deployed to partner Bugzilla  for pre-release
> testing, if your testing reveals any issues please update this bug.
That looks much better, thanks. (I know, you wrote 'reveals any issues', but positive feedback is a good feedback. I hope.)
This change is now live. If there are any issues, do not reopen this bug.
Instead, you should create a new bug and reference this bug.