Bug 168071 - No Bugzilla component for Maxima in Fedora Extras
No Bugzilla component for Maxima in Fedora Extras
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 167870
Product: Bugzilla
Classification: Community
Component: Bugzilla General (Show other bugs)
2.18
All Linux
medium Severity medium (vote)
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: David Lawrence
David Lawrence
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/...
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-09-12 01:06 EDT by Kevin Kofler
Modified: 2007-04-18 13:31 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-22 06:18:33 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Kevin Kofler 2005-09-12 01:06:47 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90; H010818)

Description of problem:
Bugzilla is missing components for maxima and its subpackages / related packages in Fedora Extras.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/easy_enter_bug.cgi
2. "Continue"
3. Choose "Fedora Extras", "Continue"
4. Try to select "maxima".
  

Actual Results:  "maxima" (and possibly maxima-gui, maxima-runtime-clisp and maxima-src) should be in the components list.

Expected Results:  "maxima" is nowhere to be found in the components list.

Additional info:

I have 2 bugs to file against maxima-gui, so it would be nice to have somewhere to put them.
Comment 1 David Lawrence 2005-09-12 16:15:29 EDT
Elliot, can you look into whether there is a problem with components not being
added properly to Bugzilla from the accounts system or whether this component is
not in the owners.list file?
Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2005-09-22 06:18:33 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 167870 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.