Bug 1685515 - Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp - Sphinx extension for Devhelp documents
Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp - Sphinx extension for Devhelp d...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Patrik Kopkan
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: SPHINX2
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-03-05 11:49 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2019-03-06 14:22 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp-1.0.1-1.fc31
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-03-06 14:22:18 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
pkopkan: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2019-03-05 11:49:02 UTC
Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp.spec
SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm

Description:
sphinxcontrib-devhelp is a sphinx extension which outputs Devhelp document.

Fedora Account System Username: churchyard

Comment 1 Patrik Kopkan 2019-03-06 13:21:20 UTC
The shared directory for sphinxcontrib libraries is not issue because each package owns its subdirectory. I approve this package


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "BSD (unspecified)", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
     "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 62 files
     have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/pkopkan/Documents/review/1685515-python-sphinxcontrib-
     devhelp/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-
     packages/sphinxcontrib(python3-sphinxcontrib-spelling, python3
     -sphinxcontrib-bibtex, python3-sphinxcontrib-adadomain, python3
     -sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python3-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python3
     -sphinxcontrib-actdiag, python3-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker, python3
     -sphinxcontrib-blockdiag, python3-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram, python3
     -sphinxcontrib-phpdomain, python3-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[??]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
{x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[?]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]:Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-sphinxcontrib-devhelp-1.0.1-1.fc30.noarch.rpm
          python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp-1.0.1-1.fc30.src.rpm
python3-sphinxcontrib-devhelp.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/sphinxcontrib/devhelp/locales /usr/share/locale
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

Requires
--------
python3-sphinxcontrib-devhelp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)

Provides
--------
python3-sphinxcontrib-devhelp:
    python3-sphinxcontrib-devhelp
    python3.7dist(sphinxcontrib-devhelp)
    python3dist(sphinxcontrib-devhelp)

Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinxcontrib-devhelp/sphinxcontrib-devhelp-1.0.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 6c64b077937330a9128a4da74586e8c2130262f014689b4b89e2d08ee7294a34
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6c64b077937330a9128a4da74586e8c2130262f014689b4b89e2d08ee7294a34

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2019-03-06 14:19:27 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2019-03-06 14:22:18 UTC
Thank You.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.