Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1685960

Summary: Critical daemonsets are created without an empty toleration
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Juan Luis de Sousa-Valadas <jdesousa>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Vadim Rutkovsky <vrutkovs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Johnny Liu <jialiu>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 3.10.0CC: aos-bugs, jokerman, mmccomas
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 3.10.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-03-06 13:33:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Juan Luis de Sousa-Valadas 2019-03-06 12:01:57 UTC
Description of problem:
Critical daemonsets don't have a tolerate everything toleration which looks like this:
~~~
tolerations:
  - operator: "Exists"
~~~

This includes the sdn, ovs daemonsets in the openshift-sdn project, the sync daemonset in the openshift-node project and the fluentd daemonset in the logging project.


Version-Release number of the following components:
All 3.10 branch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. oc taint node <node name> ataint=tainted:NoSchedule
 
Actual results:
Node is tainted, critical pods won't run

Expected results:
All critical daemonsets run on every node

Additional info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635462 - openshift-sdn fixed in 3.11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635804 - openshift-sync pod fixed in 3.11

Comment 1 Juan Luis de Sousa-Valadas 2019-03-06 12:15:40 UTC
3.11  bug for fluentd ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685970

Comment 2 Scott Dodson 2019-03-06 13:29:31 UTC
Thanks, I know we added this toleration to control plane pods and I think we discussed adding them to SDN and others. I'll see if I can find the outcome of that discussion.

Comment 4 Scott Dodson 2019-03-06 13:33:35 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1685952 ***