Hide Forgot
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pre-commit.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pre-commit-1.14.4-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks. Fedora Account System Username: atim
- Your package is noarch, you don't need this: %global debug_package %{nil} No debuginfo is gathered for noarch packages. - Bump to 1.15.1, drop the patch that has been merged - Consider using: %?python_enable_dependency_generator to automatically generates Requires instead of listing them. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EnablingPythonGenerators#How_To_Test (enabled by default in F30) - Please remove all the trailing spaces in your SPEC. Whatever editor you use there should be an option to remove trailing spaces on save. - Seems you don't have all Requires packaged yet: DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Error: DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: Problem: conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(aspy.yaml) needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(importlib-metadata) needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(cfgv) >= 1.4.0 needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch DEBUG util.py:554: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides python3.7dist(identify) >= 1.0.0 needed by python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch - Run the tests with pytest - Simply use: Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 170 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-pre-commit/review-python-pre- commit/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm Rpmlint ------- Checking: python3-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.noarch.rpm python-pre-commit-1.15.1-1.fc31.src.rpm python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/pre-commit-validate-config python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pre-commit python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pre-commit-validate-config python3-pre-commit.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pre-commit-validate-manifest 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
JFYI I'm packaging importlib-metadata for new tox. Also, this should be called just pre-commit, not python-pre-commit and python3-pre-commit, thanks.
Can we please move this forward?
Sure. Apologize, it required many python packages which was not packaged when i am first time tried to build it. < 2 days.
Fixed 'python-pre-commit' but not fixed Tests yet: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079060-python-pre-commit/python-pre-commit.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079060-python-pre-commit/python-pre-commit-1.18.3-1.fc31.src.rpm --- Packages which we still need to package for 'python-pre-commit': - nothing provides python3.7dist(aspy.yaml) needed by python3-pre-commit-1.18.3-1.fc31.noarch - nothing provides python3.7dist(cfgv) >= 2 needed by python3-pre-commit-1.18.3-1.fc31.noarch - nothing provides python3.7dist(identify) >= 1 needed by python3-pre-commit-1.18.3-1.fc31.noarch Will start packaging them in alphabetical order.
This should be called just pre-commit, not python-pre-commit and python3-pre-commit, thanks.
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #6) > This should be called just pre-commit, not python-pre-commit and > python3-pre-commit, thanks. ✅ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079071-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec ✅ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079071-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.18.3-2.fc31.src.rpm
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079109-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079109-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.18.3-3.fc31.src.rpm We also need package 'python-identify' for pre-commit. Required for Tests.
All required packages packaged. pre-commit compiles and works, but without Tests. So TODO: fix Tests... https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079241-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079241-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.18.3-4.fc31.src.rpm Build log: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079241-pre-commit/builder-live.log.gz
BuildRequires: python3dist(importlib-metadata) This needs to be conditionalized for Fedora <= 31.
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #10) > BuildRequires: python3dist(importlib-metadata) > > This needs to be conditionalized for Fedora <= 31. ✅ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079278-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec ✅ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079278-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.18.3-5.fc31.src.rpm --- But we still need to fix tests. Now we here: empty_template_setup (unittest.loader._FailedTest) ... ERROR color_windows (unittest.loader._FailedTest) ... ERROR ImportError: cannot import name 'windll' from 'ctypes' (/usr/lib64/python3.7/ctypes/__init__.py)
> ImportError: cannot import name 'windll' from 'ctypes' Sounds very windows-y. Are you sure the way you run the test in %check is correct? Try running them with pytest maybe, as does upstream. %check %{python3} -m pytest -v
Another thing, I suggest using https://pre-commit.com as the URL.
And please replace: %{python3_sitelib}/pre_commit %{python3_sitelib}/pre_commit-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info With: %{python3_sitelib}/pre_commit/ %{python3_sitelib}/pre_commit-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/ The slashes make sure this will always remain a directory. The ?.? glob would break with Python 3.10.
Miro Hrončok, thank you. Fixed a little bit... https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079306-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079306-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.18.3-5.fc31.src.rpm --- Build log for F31: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01079306-pre-commit/builder-live.log Build log for Rawhide: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01079306-pre-commit/builder-live.log.gz
f31: E git config --global user.email "you@example.com" E git config --global user.name "Your Name" actually do that before running the tests rawhide: pre_commit/constants.py:4: in <module> import importlib_metadata # TODO: importlib.metadata py38? E ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'importlib_metadata' This will need an upstream patch. I can help, or if you want to try yourself, here are some examples: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pluggy/pull/223 https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/pull/5539 https://github.com/tox-dev/tox/pull/1368 (unless this is already fixed in pre-commit master)
Here: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/commit/f8f81db36d3f43cee3a73e3377ce07df93b54d0e
@Miro, thank you, learned a lot from you. > Here: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/commit/f8f81db36d3f43cee3a73e3377ce07df93b54d0e This fixed and now it compiles fine with new python 3.8 in Rawhide. --- There is still some test which we need to fix or disable few of them: ============== 33 failed, 557 passed, 6 skipped in 122.10 seconds ============== --- For learning purposes i will choice another package next time, because IMHO this package is pretty serious and truth to be told i don't even need it now for my initial package which i want to have in repos, so i definitely ask for help you and co-maintain this pre-commit. Also i updating my package very quickly usually, but maybe i will not have to much time in future but this package requires good maintenance. All required packages for pre-commit packaged BTW, few of them still on review. --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01080573-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01080573-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.18.3-8.fc31.src.rpm --- Build log F31: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-31-x86_64/01080573-pre-commit/builder-live.log.gz
I will gladly co-maintain this.
Failed dependencies that I found: Package that is obsolete in Fedora: 'python3dist(importlib-metadata)': [1] Packages that have open Fedora Review requests: 'python3dist(aspy.yaml)': [2] 'python3dist(identify) >= 1.0.0' [3] [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754151 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765196 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765265
Hello everyone! I am not able to get the latest spec/srpm (getting a 404). Anyways, I had written a spec as I was not aware of this request. Out of all the failing tests, only one test fails as they only make sense when testing on a virtual environment [0] (that test also requires pytest-env, not yet packaged for Fedora). We can disable that test and proceed further on. We would also need to apply some patches to fix the remaining of the failing tests [1]-[2]. Other than that, here is my attempt at writing up a spec: https://major.fedorapeople.org/python-pre-commit/python-pre-commit.spec SRPM: https://major.fedorapeople.org/python-pre-commit/python-pre-commit-1.20.0-1.fc31.src.rpm The scratch build fails because I am not sure how to apply the patches for the same. For now, I have added the patches/diffs in the same directory. I will change the name of the package as discussed above. [0]: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/issues/1235#issuecomment-562868123 [1]: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/pull/1236 [2]: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit/pull/1237
> how to apply the patches Does "%autosetup -p1" help?
https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/pre-commit.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/pre-commit-1.20.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Full build log with enabled tests: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/build.log > I am not able to get the latest spec/srpm (getting a 404). Copr died today. I wrote in #fedora-buildsys about this. I can't check your spec and srpm as well - 404.
Hey! Thanks for providing the files. I changed the name of the package, hence the path changed :P Here are the new files: spec: https://major.fedorapeople.org/pre-commit/pre-commit.spec srpm: https://major.fedorapeople.org/pre-commit/pre-commit-1.20.0-1.fc31.src.rpm The scratch build fails with some ambiguous reason: line 43: /usr/bin/git: No such file or directory Here is the scratch: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39460974 The package builds fine locally.
> spec: https://major.fedorapeople.org/pre-commit/pre-commit.spec > srpm: https://major.fedorapeople.org/pre-commit/pre-commit-1.20.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Updated the files above. The package now builds perfectly fine. > The scratch build fails with some ambiguous reason: line 43: /usr/bin/git: > No such file or directory I just had to fix the ordering of the lines, so not much of an issue. Here [0] is the scratch build for the same. [0]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39563479
Hello everyone! Can we push this request further? The patches are no longer required in the new version of pre-commit. @artem, since you had opened this request, then maybe you would have to provide the final spec/srpm which can be reviewed upon.
(In reply to Aniket Pradhan from comment #26) > @artem, since you had opened this request, then maybe you would have to > provide the final spec/srpm which can be reviewed upon. Sure. Will do shortly. And @Aniket i'll add you with full permission and full control of package.
Latest 1.21.0 version https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01167933-pre-commit/pre-commit.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/python-packages/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01167933-pre-commit/pre-commit-1.21.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Hi everybody, I would like to help with this package if possible as I'm one of the maintainers of python3-molecule that recently has added pre-commit as a runtime dependency. Hope this get released for before the next release freeze
Package approved.
congrats, when can we expect the package to be added to src.fedoraproject.org and be buildable in koji/bodhi ?
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pre-commit
(In reply to chedi toueiti from comment #31) > congrats, when can we expect the package to be added to > src.fedoraproject.org and be buildable in koji/bodhi ? Hi, pushed to repos. I'll add @Miro, @major, @chedi as co-maintainers. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1473a3f45a
Can I add @python-sig as well?
@Miro, sure!
> Hi, pushed to repos. I'll add @Miro, @major, @chedi as co-maintainers. Thanks for this @artem. I will start working on the package pre-commit was a dep for. :D
pre-commit-2.1.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.