Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 16985 - with cyl>1024, did not detect bad lilo install
with cyl>1024, did not detect bad lilo install
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 16982
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: anaconda (Show other bugs)
7.1
i386 Linux
medium Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Brock Organ
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2000-08-26 10:09 EDT by Gene Czarcinski
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-08-29 12:27:47 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Gene Czarcinski 2000-08-26 10:09:26 EDT 
I did a harddisk fresh install of rc2 into a partition which started at cyl
1177.  Although lilo could not run properly since linar is specified,
anaconda did not produce any error messages.
Comment 1 Gene Czarcinski 2000-08-26 10:17:23 EDT 
Mmm ... maybe it tried.  I now remember that I got some "garbage" (partial
clutter on the screen) on the screen:

"ning: device 0x030a"
"for linear mode (try"

I now believe that this was from lilo.  However, there was nother from anaconda.
Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2000-08-29 12:26:11 EDT 
Was this a pre-existing partition you used for the install?
Comment 3 Michael Fulbright 2000-08-29 12:27:45 EDT 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16982 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.