RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1727853 - dnf download ignores destdir argument for some packages
Summary: dnf download ignores destdir argument for some packages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: dnf-plugins-core
Version: 8.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: amatej
QA Contact: Luca Berton
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1727137
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-07-08 11:21 UTC by Daniel Mach
Modified: 2023-02-12 23:08 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: dnf-4.2.16-1.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1727137
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-28 16:48:04 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHELPLAN-28100 0 None None None 2023-02-12 23:08:57 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:1823 0 None None None 2020-04-28 16:49:03 UTC

Description Daniel Mach 2019-07-08 11:21:45 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1727137 +++

Description of problem:

dnf download ignores destdir argument when fetching remote packages through a local repository

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
dnf-plugins-core-4.0.7-1.fc30

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a local repository using createrepo_c at /some/path

2. Merge a remote repository into it with mergerepo_c. Now you have a mix of some packages with just <location href="x86_64/foo-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm"> and some with <location xml:base="http://somewhere.else/" href="bar-2.0.0-2.x86_64.rpm">

3. dnf download --repofrompath="fred,file:///some/path" --repo fred --destdir /tmp foo bar


Actual results:

/some/path/x86_64/foo-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm is correctly copied to /tmp/foo-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm

BUT

http://somewhere.else/bar-2.0.0-2.x86_64.rpm is downloaded to /some/path/bar-2.0.0-2.x86_64.rpm

Whut?


Expected results:

Both foo-1.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm and bar-2.0.0-2.x86_64.rpm should be copied to /tmp

Additional info:

Comment 1 amatej 2019-08-21 08:54:27 UTC
I created a patch for DNF that should fix this: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1464

And here are tests for this: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/589

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 16:48:04 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1823


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.