Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/MUSIC/MUSIC.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/MUSIC/MUSIC-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc30.src.rpm Description: MUSIC is an API allowing large scale neuron simulators using MPI internally to exchange data during runtime. MUSIC provides mechanisms to transfer massive amounts of event information and continuous values from one parallel application to another. Special care has been taken to ensure that existing simulators can be adapted to MUSIC. In particular, MUSIC handles data transfer between applications that use different time steps and different data allocation strategies. This is the MUSIC pilot implementation. The two most important components built from this software distribution is the music library `libmusic.a' and the music utility `music'. A MUSIC-aware simulator links against the C++ library and can be launched using mpirun together with the music utility as described below. MUSIC can also be used from a C program using the API in music-c.h. MUSIC is distributed under the GNU General Public License v3. Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36346224 There seems to be a build failure on ppc related to openmpi. I need to look into it.
- Not needed anymore except for EPEL7. F29 and above use transfiletriggers. # For F28 etc? %ldconfig_scriptlets - You also need to add a Provides: bundled(rudeconfig) = 5.0.5-1 - Not sure which package should own this: [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/mpich/share - These man pages, I'm not sure it is ok to install them as such: MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventcounter.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventcounter.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventgenerator.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventgenerator.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventlogger.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventlogger.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventselect.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventselect.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsink.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsink.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsource.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsource.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/music.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/music.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/viewevents.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/viewevents.1.gz MUSIC-mpich-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Subfolders of man/ are either manX or %lang. Also I've tested it and the manpage aren't available when called with man. - These patch are included but not applied: MUSIC.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: 0002-Make-python-bits-ourselves.patch MUSIC.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: 0003-Make-bundled-rudeconfig-also-follow-all-flags.patch Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License (v3)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)". 568 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/MUSIC/review- MUSIC/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/mpich/share [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 6 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate. [x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in MUSIC- mpich , MUSIC-mpich-devel , python3-MUSIC-mpich , MUSIC-openmpi , MUSIC-openmpi-devel , python3-MUSIC-openmpi [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: MUSIC-mpich-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm MUSIC-mpich-devel-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm python3-MUSIC-mpich-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm MUSIC-openmpi-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm MUSIC-openmpi-devel-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm python3-MUSIC-openmpi-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm MUSIC-debuginfo-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm MUSIC-debugsource-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.x86_64.rpm MUSIC-1.1.15-2.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31.src.rpm MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmusic -> lib music, lib-music, musicality MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpirun -> umpire MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventcounter.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventcounter.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventgenerator.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventgenerator.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventlogger.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventlogger.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventselect.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventselect.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsink.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsink.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsource.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/eventsource.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/music.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/music.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/viewevents.1.gz MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/mpich-x86_64/man1/viewevents.1.gz MUSIC-mpich-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib python3-MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmusic -> lib music, lib-music, musicality python3-MUSIC-mpich.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpirun -> umpire MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmusic -> lib music, lib-music, musicality MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpirun -> umpire MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventcounter.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventcounter.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventgenerator.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventgenerator.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventlogger.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventlogger.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventselect.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventselect.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventsink.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventsink.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventsource.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/eventsource.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/music.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/music.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: E: invalid-locale-man-dir /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/viewevents.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/openmpi-x86_64/man1/viewevents.1.gz MUSIC-openmpi-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib python3-MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmusic -> lib music, lib-music, musicality python3-MUSIC-openmpi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpirun -> umpire MUSIC.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mpirun -> umpire MUSIC.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch1: 0002-Make-python-bits-ourselves.patch MUSIC.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch2: 0003-Make-bundled-rudeconfig-also-follow-all-flags.patch 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 16 errors, 29 warnings.
> - These man pages, I'm not sure it is ok to install them as such: They are correct. They become available after one does 'module load mpi/mpich-x86_64'. Also the rpmlint errors for this are bogus. > There seems to be a build failure on ppc related to openmpi. I need to look into it. mpi4py on openmpi if flaky in rawhide now, and in ppc64le in particular. I wouldn't worry too much if this is the only failure.
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3) > > There seems to be a build failure on ppc related to openmpi. I need to look into it. > > mpi4py on openmpi if flaky in rawhide now, and in ppc64le in particular. I > wouldn't worry too much if this is the only failure. Would it be OK to exclude arch then? If the ppc build fails, the whole build fails and we won't be able to send it out to users.
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #4) > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3) > > > There seems to be a build failure on ppc related to openmpi. I need to look into it. > > > > mpi4py on openmpi if flaky in rawhide now, and in ppc64le in particular. I > > wouldn't worry too much if this is the only failure. > > Would it be OK to exclude arch then? If the ppc build fails, the whole build > fails and we won't be able to send it out to users. I think it's ok, but you'll need to file a bug report for it as per guidelines
It's probably better to accept test failure on the architecture (either ignore some specific tests or add "|| :" under %ifarch). If the package is not available on some architectures, this "cascades" into dependent packages, and makes things more complicated in general.
Created attachment 1613186 [details] build log failure ppc It isn't a test failure, unfortunately. On ppc, it can't find MPI for openmpi. Any ideas?
The build now succeeds on ppc also. Updated spec/srpm: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/MUSIC/MUSIC.spec https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/MUSIC/MUSIC-1.1.15-3.20190717gita78a8e2.fc32.src.rpm - removed ldconfig scriptlets - add Provides for bundled rudeconfig - moved the arch independent files to a noarch -common sub-package, - the "patch not applied" rpmlint errors are wrong, from the build-log: + pushd MUSIC-a78a8e2c90b07274db94265db75c320dbb01f9fb ~/build/BUILD/MUSIC-a78a8e2c90b07274db94265db75c320dbb01f9fb/MUSIC-a78a8e2c90b07274db94265db75c320dbb01f9fb ~/build/BUILD/MUSIC-a78a8e2c90b07274db94265db75c320dbb01f9fb + echo 'Patch #0 (0001-Enable-testsuite-and-extras-for-mpich2.patch):' Patch #0 (0001-Enable-testsuite-and-extras-for-mpich2.patch): + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0 patching file configure.ac + echo 'Patch #1 (0002-Make-python-bits-ourselves.patch):' Patch #1 (0002-Make-python-bits-ourselves.patch): + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0 patching file pymusic/Makefile.am + echo 'Patch #2 (0003-Make-bundled-rudeconfig-also-follow-all-flags.patch):' Patch #2 (0003-Make-bundled-rudeconfig-also-follow-all-flags.patch): + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0 patching file rudeconfig/Makefile.am + sed -i 's|mpich2version|mpichversion|' c .. Thanks
Scratch build URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38306197
LGTM, package approved.
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/MUSIC
FEDORA-2019-03ab428e60 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-03ab428e60
MUSIC-1.1.15-3.20190717gita78a8e2.fc30, nest-2.18.0-7.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bc5c9971b3
MUSIC-1.1.15-3.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31, nest-2.18.0-7.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-03ab428e60
MUSIC-1.1.15-3.20190717gita78a8e2.fc30, nest-2.18.0-7.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
MUSIC-1.1.15-3.20190717gita78a8e2.fc31, nest-2.18.0-7.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.