Bug 1742913 - biber-2.14 is available
Summary: biber-2.14 is available
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: biber
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Colin Macdonald
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-08-17 14:47 UTC by Upstream Release Monitoring
Modified: 2020-05-20 03:45 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: biber-2.14-1.fc33
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-20 03:45:46 UTC
Type: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
[patch] Update to 2.13 (#1742913) (1.06 KB, patch)
2019-08-17 14:47 UTC, Upstream Release Monitoring
no flags Details | Diff

Description Upstream Release Monitoring 2019-08-17 14:47:45 UTC
Latest upstream release: 2.13
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.11-6.fc31
URL: http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6443/

Comment 1 Upstream Release Monitoring 2019-08-17 14:47:49 UTC
Created attachment 1605296 [details]
[patch] Update to 2.13 (#1742913)

Comment 2 Upstream Release Monitoring 2019-08-17 14:50:58 UTC
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org@FEDORAPROJECT.ORG's scratch build of biber-2.13-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37100542

Comment 3 Colin Macdonald 2019-11-17 23:47:33 UTC
as usual this won't happen until texlive-biblatex hits 3.13.

Comment 4 Upstream Release Monitoring 2019-12-01 16:55:43 UTC
Latest upstream release: 2.14
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.12-1.fc32
URL: http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6443/

Comment 5 Upstream Release Monitoring 2019-12-01 16:55:48 UTC
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been automatically reported. Sorry!

Comment 6 Petr Pisar 2020-05-15 10:38:42 UTC
Fedora 33 just received texlive-biblatex-svn53063-20.fc33.noarch with /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/biblatex/biblatex.bst file:

FUNCTION {initialize} {
  "$Revision: 3.13 $"

For your information, a test in current Fedora's biber fails <https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/8342988>.

Comment 7 Colin Macdonald 2020-05-16 01:54:07 UTC
Thanks!  @spot and @orion have done a lot.  There is a failing test I'm looking at now:

```
t/utils.t ................. 
1..82
ok 1 - File location - 1
ok 2 - File location - 2
ok 3 - File location - 3
ERROR - Cannot find 'plain.tex'!
# Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 3.
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 79/82 subtests 
```

Comment 8 Colin Macdonald 2020-05-16 02:02:03 UTC
The test looks for plain.tex.

On Fedora 32:

$ kpsewhich plain.tex
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/plain/base/plain.tex


On Rawhide, it doesn't return anything, even thought that file exists:


$ kpsewhich plain.tex
$
$ ls /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/plain/base/plain.tex
/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/plain/base/plain.tex


Tom has something changed after the texlive upgrade?

Comment 9 Orion Poplawski 2020-05-16 02:06:09 UTC
Yeah, I have a fix for this coming shortly - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836464

Comment 11 Colin Macdonald 2020-05-16 02:20:22 UTC
Maybe this is no longer relevant, but I tried to post this and got a midair collision:

On rawhide-test.fedorainfracloud.org, I tried to reinstall kpathsea and got some errors:

$ sudo dnf reinstall texlive-kpathsea

Downloading Packages:
texlive-kpathsea-20200327-2.fc33.x86_64.rpm               6.6 MB/s | 1.1 MB     00:00    
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                     2.0 MB/s | 1.1 MB     00:00     
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
  Preparing        :                                                                  1/1 
  Reinstalling     : texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64                        1/2 
  Cleanup          : texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64                        2/2 
  Running scriptlet: texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64                        2/2 
cat: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/web2c/fmtutil-hdr.cnf: No such file or directory
warning: %triggerpostun(texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1

Error in <unknown> scriptlet in rpm package texlive-kpathsea
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2wk3Qz: line 11: /usr/bin/updmap-sys: No such file or directory

  Verifying        : texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64                        1/2 
  Verifying        : texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64                        2/2 

Reinstalled:
  texlive-kpathsea-7:20200327-2.fc33.x86_64                                               

Complete!

Comment 12 Orion Poplawski 2020-05-19 03:15:12 UTC
Yeah, that's at least one of the things hopefully fixed in the latest build.  We are still seeing very strange things in koji though that we have so far been unable to diagnose.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.