RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1753684 - Excessive memory usage while dealing with a flood of kernel messages
Summary: Excessive memory usage while dealing with a flood of kernel messages
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1928078
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: NetworkManager
Version: 8.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: NetworkManager Development Team
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-09-19 15:03 UTC by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Modified: 2022-06-29 13:17 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-17 09:52:51 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1753677 1 high CLOSED High cpu usage while non-controlled interface is mangling tc filters 2023-05-06 09:58:50 UTC

Internal Links: 1753677

Description Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 2019-09-19 15:03:10 UTC
Description of problem:
Test consist of adding 1M tc filter rules, such as:
# tc qdisc add dev p6p1 ingress
# tc -b add.0
on which:
[root@wsfd-netdev19 ~]# head add.0
filter add dev p6p1 protocol ip ingress prio 1 handle 1 flower skip_hw src_mac e4:11:0:0:0:0 dst_mac e4:12:0:0:0:0  action gact drop
filter add dev p6p1 protocol ip ingress prio 1 handle 2 flower skip_hw src_mac e4:11:0:0:0:1 dst_mac e4:12:0:0:0:1  action gact drop

even with:
[root@wsfd-netdev19 ~]# cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-p6p1
NM_CONTROLLED=no

I see:
   PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
 10684 root      20   0    9888    700    584 R  99.3  0.0   0:22.06 tc
  1077 root      20   0  755728 292112   6692 S  53.6  0.3   1:41.64 NetworkManager
                                ^^^^^^ excess usage

It grows during the test, and may grow more when ran multiple times, but it tends to stabilize. Seems that this could be a glib/malloc() caching.
This memory seems to be never returned.

I didn't try on RHEL8/Fedora yet.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
NetworkManager-1.18.0-6.el7.x86_64

Comment 3 Thomas Haller 2020-07-16 11:32:38 UTC
this is a valid bug, but we should first investigate and fix it on RHEL8.

Also, it probably requires larger work, which we may not do for RHEL7 anymore.

Reassigning to RHEL8.

Comment 6 Gris Ge 2021-03-24 04:22:46 UTC
Hi Thomas,

Will this bug been solved as side effect of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847125 ?

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2021-03-31 07:30:51 UTC
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.

Comment 10 Gris Ge 2021-09-17 09:52:51 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1928078 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.